Improving estimates of fractional vegetation cover based on UAV in alpine grassland on the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau

Fractional vegetation cover (FVC) is an important parameter in studies of ecosystem balance, soil erosion, and climate change. Remote-sensing inversion is a common approach to estimating FVC. However, there is an important gap between ground-based surveys (quadrat level) and remote-sensing imagery (...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of remote sensing Vol. 37; no. 8; pp. 1922 - 1936
Main Authors Chen, Jianjun, Yi, Shuhua, Qin, Yu, Wang, Xiaoyun
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Taylor & Francis 17.04.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Fractional vegetation cover (FVC) is an important parameter in studies of ecosystem balance, soil erosion, and climate change. Remote-sensing inversion is a common approach to estimating FVC. However, there is an important gap between ground-based surveys (quadrat level) and remote-sensing imagery (satellite image pixel scale) from satellites. In this study we evaluated that gap with unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) aerial images of alpine grassland on the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau (QTP). The results showed that: (1) the most accurate estimations of FVC came from UAV (FVC UAV) at the satellite image pixel scale, and when FVC was estimated using ground-based surveys (FVC gᵣₒᵤₙd), the accuracy increased as the number of quadrats used increased and was inversely proportional to the heterogeneity of the underlying surface condition; (2) the UAV method was more efficient than conventional ground-based survey methods at the satellite image pixel scale; and (3) the coefficient of determination (R ²) between FVC UAV and vegetation indices (VIs) was significantly greater than that between FVC gᵣₒᵤₙd and VIs (p < 0.05, n = 5). Our results suggest that the use of UAV to estimate FVC at the satellite image pixel scale provides more accurate results and is more efficient than conventional ground-based survey methods.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2016.1165884
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1366-5901
0143-1161
1366-5901
DOI:10.1080/01431161.2016.1165884