The benefits and safety of oral sequential antibiotic therapy in non-complicated and complicated Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia
•Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia is associated with high morbidity and mortality.•Its adequate management includes long-term intravenous therapy.•Oral sequential therapy could be a safe option in selected patients. Treatment optimization for serious infections, such as Staphylococcus aureus bactere...
Saved in:
Published in | International journal of infectious diseases Vol. 102; pp. 554 - 560 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Canada
Elsevier Ltd
01.01.2021
Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | •Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia is associated with high morbidity and mortality.•Its adequate management includes long-term intravenous therapy.•Oral sequential therapy could be a safe option in selected patients.
Treatment optimization for serious infections, such as Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB), is a challenge for antimicrobial stewardship teams. Currently, SAB guidelines recommend a completely intravenous therapy (CIT).
The objective of the study was to analyze the usefulness and safety of oral sequential therapy (OST) in SAB.
We conducted a retrospective, observational study in a tertiary teaching hospital in Spain. The inclusion criteria were complicated and non-complicated monomicrobial SAB and an adequate duration of therapy, with patients classified into OST or CIT. The primary endpoint was the 90-day recurrence of S. aureus infection. We also analyzed the mortality, the length of the hospital stay, and the duration of the intravenous antibiotic administration.
Of a total of 201 patients with SAB, 125 (62%) underwent OST. The most commonly administered oral antibiotic was trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (66% of patients). Of those administered OST, 43% had complicated bacteremia (most with an osteoarticular source of infection), and 6% had an intravascular device. The 90-day recurrence rate was 4%, with no differences between the two groups. The duration of the therapy (22 [16–28] vs. 13 days [8–17] for CIT and OST, respectively; p < 0.001) and the hospital stay (36 [27–71] vs. 18 days [13–29] for CIT and OST, respectively; p < 0.001) were shorter for OST. MRSA was related with mortality (OR 4.4, 95% CI [1.67−11.37]; p = 0.003).
OST for properly selected patients with SAB could be a safe therapeutic option and can reduce their use of CIT and their hospital stay. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Undefined-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1201-9712 1878-3511 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.10.097 |