Vestibular function in the space environment

• Published in: Acta astronautica Vol. 2; no. 1; pp. 49 - 58
• Main Authors: von Baumgarten, R.J., Baldrighi, G., Shillinger, G.L., Harth, O., Thuemler, R.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Elsevier Ltd 1975
• Subjects: Acceleration; Afterimage - physiology; Eye Movements - physiology; Gravitation; Humans; Optical Illusions - physiology; Photic Stimulation; Space Flight; Space life sciences; Vestibule, Labyrinth - physiology; Weightlessness
• ISSN: 0094-5765; 1879-2030
• DOI: 10.1016/0094-5765(75)90042-9

Adaptation to the weightless state and readaptation after space flight to the 1-G environment on the ground are accompanied by various transitory symptoms of vestibular instability, kinetosis, and illusory sensations. Aside from the problem of how to treat and if possible prevent such symptoms, they offer a clue to a better understanding of normal vestibular functions. Weightlessness is a powerful new “tool” of vestibular research. Graybiel reported as early as 1952 that human subjects observed the illusion that a real target and the visual afterimage seemed to raise in the visual field during centrifugation when the subjects were looking toward the axis of rotation (oculogravic illusion). In aircraft parabolic-flight weightlessness, human subjects observed that fixed real targets appeared to have moved downward while visual afterimages appeared to have moved upward (oculo agravic illusion). It can be shown by electronystagmography as well as by a method employing double afterimages that part of this illusion is caused by eye movements that are triggered by the changing input from the otolith system. Another part of the illusion is based on a change of the subjective horizontal and must be caused by convergence of vestibular and visual impulses “behind” the eyes. This part was measured independently of the first one by using a new method. Eye movements could be prevented during these experiments by optical fixation with the right eye on a target at the end of a 24-in. long tube which was rigidly attached parallel to the longitudinal axis of an aircraft. At the same time the subject tried to line up a shorter tube, which was pivoting around his left eye, with the subjective horizon.