Leukocyte-Rich Platelet-Rich Plasma Has Better Stimulating Effects on Tenocyte Proliferation Compared With Leukocyte-Poor Platelet-Rich Plasma

• Published in: Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine Vol. 10; no. 3; p. 23259671221084706
• Main Authors: Lin, Keng-Yi, Chen, Poyu, Chen, Alvin Chao-Yu, Chan, Yi-Sheng, Lei, Kin Fong, Chiu, Chih-Hao
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.03.2022; Sage Publications Ltd
• Subjects: Gene expression; Growth factors; Orthopedics; Sports medicine; rotator cuff; platelet-rich plasma; tenocytes; leukocyte
• ISSN: 2325-9671; 2325-9671
• DOI: 10.1177/23259671221084706

Background: Rotator cuff (RC) tendinopathy is one of the most common causes of shoulder pain. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been frequently used in clinical scenarios, but its efficacy remains inconsistent. Purpose: To investigate the different responses of human tenocytes from torn RCs to leukocyte-rich PRP (LR-PRP) and leukocyte-poor PRP (LP-PRP) in a 2-chamber coculture device. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: PRP was prepared using different platelet and leukocyte concentrations according to 5 groups: (1) LR-PRP with 5000 platelets/µL, (2) LR-PRP with 10,000 platelets/µL, (3) LP-PRP with 5000 platelets/µL, (4) LP-PRP with 10,000 platelets/µL, and (5) control with only culture medium supplementation and without PRP stimulation. Platelet-derived growth factor–AB (PDGF-AB) and transforming growth factor–β1 (TGF-β1) were measured in LR-PRP and LP-PRP via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Microscopy, water-soluble tetrazolium salt assay, and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction were used to investigate the morphology, proliferation, and gene expression of RC tenocytes exposed to different PRP formulations. Data were collected from at least 3 independent measurements. The results were analyzed via 1-way analysis of variance, followed by the post hoc Bonferroni test. Results: The ratio of leukocytes to 5000 platelets/µL was 29.5 times higher in LR-PRP than in LP-PRP (P < .05). In the 5000 platelets/µL groups, the levels of TGF-β1 and PDGF-AB were both significantly higher in LR-PRP versus LP-PRP (TGF-β1: 367.0 ± 16.5 vs 308.6 ± 30.3 pg/mL, respectively [P = .043]; PDGF-AB: 172.1 ± 1.8 vs 94.1 ± 4.2 pg/mL, respectively [P < .001]). Compared with the control group, RC tenocyte proliferation was 1.42 ± 0.01 and 1.41 ± 0.03 times higher in the LR-PRP groups with 5000 platelets/µL and 10,000 platelets/µL, respectively (P < .05). The expression of tenocyte-related genes was higher in tenocytes cultured in LR-PRP. Conclusion: Both the LR-PRP groups with 5000 platelets/µL and 10,000 platelets/µL induced more growth factor release and increased RC tenocyte proliferation than did the LP-PRP groups. Clinical Relevance: In RC repair, LR-PRP may be better than LP-PRP for increasing the proliferation of tenocytes.