Outcomes of transanal tube placement in anterior resection: A meta-analysis and systematic review

• Published in: International journal of surgery (London, England) Vol. 59; pp. 1 - 10
• Main Authors: Wang, Fu-Gang, Yan, Wen-Mao, Yan, Ming, Song, Mao-Min
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Elsevier Ltd 01.11.2018
• Subjects: Anastomosis, Surgical - adverse effects; Anastomotic leak; Anastomotic Leak - prevention & control; Anterior resection; Decompression, Surgical - methods; Female; Humans; Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data; Male; Operative Time; Proctectomy - adverse effects; Proctectomy - methods; Rectal cancer; Rectal Neoplasms - surgery; Reoperation - statistics & numerical data; Surgical Stomas - adverse effects; Transanal tube; Rectal cancer; Anterior resection; Transanal tube; Anastomotic leak
• ISSN: 1743-9191; 1743-9159
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.09.012

In recent years, transanal tube placement was reported to be an effective procedure preventing anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of rectal cancer. However, this procedure is still controversial owing to inconsistent results found in previous studies. A comprehensive literature search was performed using Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane library from the databases inception up until June 21, 2018. The methodological quality of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies were evaluated by Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, respectively. Statistical analysis was performed using the RevMan 5.3 software. 1 randomized controlled trial and 9 cohort studies were included in our meta-analysis. The randomized controlled trial was proven to be low risk according to the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias. All of the cohort studies proved a high quality according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Patients in transanal tube group had more disadvantageous preoperative demographic characteristics than patients in non-transanal tube group. The anastomotic leak rate was lower in the transanal tube group. Patients in the transanal tube group tended to have lower reoperation rates and shorter hospital stays compared with patients in the non-transanal tube group. Despite various unfavorable preoperative characteristics, anastomotic leakage after anterior resection was lower in patients who received transanal tube placement compared with the control group. Transanal tube placement may be an alternative procedure of defunctioning stoma. A large sample size, multicenter RCT was needed to prove our results. •Transanal tube placement is still controversial in anterior resection in previous studies.•Patients in transanal tube group had more unfavorable preoperative characteristics.•The anastomotic leak rate was lower in the transanal tube group.