Barriers to overcoming immunotherapy resistance in glioblastoma

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common malignant primary brain tumor, known for its poor prognosis and high recurrence rate. Current standard of care includes surgical resection followed by combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Although immunotherapies have yielded promising results in h...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in medicine Vol. 10; p. 1175507
Main Authors Gillette, Julia S, Wang, Elaina J, Dowd, Richard S, Toms, Steven A
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 18.05.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common malignant primary brain tumor, known for its poor prognosis and high recurrence rate. Current standard of care includes surgical resection followed by combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Although immunotherapies have yielded promising results in hematological malignancies, their successful application in GBM remains limited due to a host of immunosuppressive factors unique to GBM. As a result of these roadblocks, research efforts have focused on utilizing combinatorial immunotherapies that target networks of immune processes in GBM with promising results in both preclinical and clinical trials, although limitations in overcoming the immunosuppressive factors within GBM remain. In this review, we aim to discuss the intrinsic and adaptive immune resistance unique to GBM and to summarize the current evidence and outcomes of engineered and non-engineered treatments targeted at overcoming GBM resistance to immunotherapy. Additionally, we aim to highlight the most promising strategies of targeted GBM immunotherapy combinatorial treatments and the insights that may directly improve the current patient prognosis and clinical care.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
Edited by: Prabhatchandra Dube, University of Toledo, United States
Reviewed by: David Akhavan, University of Kansas Medical Center, United States; Miguel A. Idoate, University of Seville, Spain
ISSN:2296-858X
2296-858X
DOI:10.3389/fmed.2023.1175507