Bipolar anodal septal pacing with direct LBB capture preserves physiological ventricular activation better than unipolar left bundle branch pacing

Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) produces delayed, unphysiological activation of the right ventricle. Using ultra-high-frequency electrocardiography (UHF-ECG), we explored how bipolar anodal septal pacing with direct LBB capture (aLBBP) affects the resultant ventricular depolarization pattern. In pa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine Vol. 10; p. 1140988
Main Authors Curila, Karol, Jurak, Pavel, Prinzen, Frits, Jastrzebski, Marek, Waldauf, Petr, Halamek, Josef, Tothova, Marketa, Znojilova, Lucie, Smisek, Radovan, Kach, Jakub, Poviser, Lukas, Linkova, Hana, Plesinger, Filip, Moskal, Pawel, Viscor, Ivo, Vondra, Vlastimil, Leinveber, Pavel, Osmancik, Pavel
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 22.03.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) produces delayed, unphysiological activation of the right ventricle. Using ultra-high-frequency electrocardiography (UHF-ECG), we explored how bipolar anodal septal pacing with direct LBB capture (aLBBP) affects the resultant ventricular depolarization pattern. In patients with bradycardia, His bundle pacing (HBP), unipolar nonselective LBBP (nsLBBP), aLBBP, and right ventricular septal pacing (RVSP) were performed. Timing of local ventricular activation, in leads V1-V8, was displayed using UHF-ECG, and electrical dyssynchrony (e-DYS) was calculated as the difference between the first and last activation. Durations of local depolarizations were determined as the width of the UHF-QRS complex at 50% of its amplitude. aLBBP was feasible in 63 of 75 consecutive patients with successful nsLBBP. aLBBP significantly improved ventricular dyssynchrony (mean -9 ms; 95% CI (-12;-6) vs. -24 ms (-27;-21), ), < 0.001) and shortened local depolarization durations in V1-V4 (mean differences -7 ms to -5 ms (-11;-1), < 0.05) compared to nsLBBP. aLBBP resulted in e-DYS -9 ms (-12; -6) vs. e-DYS 10 ms (7;14), < 0.001 during HBP. Local depolarization durations in V1-V2 during aLBBP were longer than HBP (differences 5-9 ms (1;14), < 0.05, with local depolarization duration in V1 during aLBBP being the same as during RVSP (difference 2 ms (-2;6), = 0.52). Although aLBBP improved ventricular synchrony and depolarization duration of the septum and RV compared to unipolar nsLBBP, the resultant ventricular depolarization was still less physiological than during HBP.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Specialty Section: This article was submitted to Cardiac Rhythmology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Edited by: Domenico Grieco, Policlinico Casilino of Rome, Italy
Reviewed by: Kevin Vernooy, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Netherlands Lina Marcantoni, Hospital Santa Maria della Misericordia of Rovigo, Italy
ORCID Karol Curila orcid.org/0000-0003-3523-6358
ISSN:2297-055X
2297-055X
DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2023.1140988