Arterial embolization and prophylactic catheterization for the treatment for severe obstetric hemorrhage

Background.  To evaluate indications, efficacy, and complications associated with arterial embolization and prophylactic balloon catheterization in the management of obstetric hemorrhage at a university hospital. Methods.  Twenty‐two women underwent arterial embolization between February 2001 and No...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica Vol. 84; no. 11; pp. 1075 - 1080
Main Authors Ojala, Kati, Perälä, Jukka, Kariniemi, Juho, Ranta, Pirjo, Raudaskoski, Tytti, Tekay, Aydin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK; Malden, USA Munksgaard International Publishers 01.11.2005
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background.  To evaluate indications, efficacy, and complications associated with arterial embolization and prophylactic balloon catheterization in the management of obstetric hemorrhage at a university hospital. Methods.  Twenty‐two women underwent arterial embolization between February 2001 and November 2003 for the treatment for primary postpartum hemorrhage resulting from abnormal placentation (n = 11), uterine atony (n = 7), paravaginal laceration (n = 3), and disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (n = 1). Blood loss was between 3.2 and 15 l. In seven patients, abnormal placentation was diagnosed prenatally and in these patients balloon catheterization was performed prophylactically before elective cesarean section. Results.  Of the seven patients, who underwent prophylactic catheterization, embolization was successful in five resulting in adequate hemostasis. Hysterectomy was performed in three, in two patients for uncontrolled hemorrhage and in one patient for placental invasion to bladder. There were no complications associated with prophylactic catheterization and embolization. The other 15 patients were treated in an emergency setting. In eight patients, embolization was performed as a primary surgery, and it was successful in six. In the other seven patients, hysterectomy was performed as an emergency surgery, but bleeding continued. Of these, in six patients, hemostasis was achieved with embolization. Complications associated with emergency embolization were observed in three patients. These were thrombosis of left popliteal artery, vaginal necrosis, and paresthesia of the right leg. Conclusions.  Arterial embolization is of significant value in treating obstetric hemorrhage. Prophylactic insertion of balloon catheters before cesarean section seems to be a safe and effective method in controlling anticipated bleeding. In patients with persistent bleeding following cesarean section and hysterectomy, embolization could be a primary procedure before resurgery.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-XBZSX9HR-L
ArticleID:AOG727
istex:76BA1C985F1E156209BDF5A8CB99920F47EC9C9D
The abstract concerning the preliminary results of the present study has been presented in the FIGO World Congress of Obstetrics & Gynecology held in Chile on 2-7 November 2003.
The abstract concerning the preliminary results of the present study has been presented in the FIGO World Congress of Obstetrics & Gynecology held in Chile on 2–7 November 2003.
ISSN:0001-6349
1600-0412
DOI:10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00727.x