Use of failure mode, effect and criticality analysis to improve safety in the medication administration process

Rationale, aims and objectives To critically evaluate the causes of preventable adverse drug events during the nurse medication administration process in inpatient units with computerized prescription order entry and profiled automated dispensing cabinets in order to prioritize interventions that ne...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of evaluation in clinical practice Vol. 21; no. 4; pp. 549 - 559
Main Authors Rodriguez-Gonzalez, Carmen Guadalupe, Martin-Barbero, Maria Luisa, Herranz-Alonso, Ana, Durango-Limarquez, Maria Isabel, Hernandez-Sampelayo, Paloma, Sanjurjo-Saez, Maria
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.08.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Rationale, aims and objectives To critically evaluate the causes of preventable adverse drug events during the nurse medication administration process in inpatient units with computerized prescription order entry and profiled automated dispensing cabinets in order to prioritize interventions that need to be implemented and to evaluate the impact of specific interventions on the criticality index. Methods This is a failure mode, effects and criticality analysis (FMECA) study. A multidisciplinary consensus committee composed of pharmacists, nurses and doctors evaluated the process of administering medications in a hospital setting in Spain. By analysing the process, all failure modes were identified and criticality was determined by rating severity, frequency and likelihood of failure detection on a scale of 1 to 10, using adapted versions of already published scales. Safety strategies were identified and prioritized. Results Through consensus, the committee identified eight processes and 40 failure modes, of which 20 were classified as high risk. The sum of the criticality indices was 5254. For the potential high‐risk failure modes, 21 different potential causes were found resulting in 24 recommendations. Thirteen recommendations were prioritized and developed over a 24‐month period, reducing total criticality from 5254 to 3572 (a 32.0% reduction). The recommendations with a greater impact on criticality were the development of an electronic medication administration record (−582) and the standardization of intravenous drug compounding in the unit (−168). Other improvements, such as barcode medication administration technology (−1033), were scheduled for a longer period of time because of lower feasibility. Conclusion FMECA is a useful approach that can improve the medication administration process.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-0VM7XTPX-6
istex:5FA1F62600D3C8807F67699C665724E4D2E0162C
iPharma (Pharmacy Innovation Center of the Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón)
ArticleID:JEP12314
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:1356-1294
1365-2753
DOI:10.1111/jep.12314