Sirolimus in pediatric patients: Results in the first 6 months post-renal transplant

• Published in: Pediatric transplantation Vol. 9; no. 4; pp. 520 - 522
• Main Authors: Hymes, Leonard C., Warshaw, Barry L.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford, UK Munksgaard International Publishers 01.08.2005; Blackwell
• Subjects: adverse events; Biological and medical sciences; Child; Cyclosporine - adverse effects; Cyclosporine - therapeutic use; Cytomegalovirus; Epstein-Barr virus; Graft Rejection - epidemiology; Graft Rejection - prevention & control; Graft Survival; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents - adverse effects; Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use; Incidence; Kidney Transplantation; Medical sciences; pediatric renal transplantation; Prednisone - adverse effects; Prednisone - therapeutic use; sirolimus; Sirolimus - adverse effects; Sirolimus - therapeutic use; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases; Surgery of the urinary system; Tacrolimus - adverse effects; Tacrolimus - therapeutic use; Treatment Outcome; Human; Postoperative; Pediatrics; Sirolimus; Toxicity; Lactone; adverse events; Homotransplantation; Macrolide; Kidney; Macrocycle; Result; Month; Antibiotic; Treatment; Urinary system; pediatric renal transplantation; Surgery; Secondary effect; Graft; Immunosuppressive agent; Antibacterial agent; Child; Kidney transplantation
• ISSN: 1397-3142; 1399-3046
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2005.00324.x

:  We report our experience with sirolimus in children during the first 6 months after renal transplantation. From July 2000 to January 2004, 66 children received 33 deceased donor and 33 living donor transplants. Maintenance immunosuppression included sirolimus 3 mg/m2 in addition to prednisone and tacrolimus or cyclosporine. Patient survival was 100% and graft survival was 65 of 66. Seven children experienced acute rejection episodes. All were reversible with increased doses of corticosteroid. One case of graft failure was caused by ischemic renal injury. Adverse events included Epstein–Barr viremia (8 patients) with three cases of post‐transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD), cytomegalovirus viremia (4 patients), poor wound healing (4 patients), pneumonitis (3 patients), nephrotic syndrome (3 patients), perinephric abscess (1 patient) and insulin‐dependant diabetes (2 patients). Sirolimus was discontinued in 13 children for adverse events predominantly for wound dehiscence and pneumonitis. Cholesterol levels >200 mg/dL were observed in 33 children. Thrombocytopenia (platelet count <140 000) was not observed. We concluded that early outcomes with sirolimus were acceptable with 98% graft survival and 11% incidence of acute rejection. Medication was discontinued in 20% for adverse events which included poor wound healing and non‐infectious pneumonitis. Infections with cytomegalovirus and Epstein–Barr virus, and PTLD were also significant early complications. Therefore, a sirolimus‐based regimen that is combined with both an interleukin‐2 receptor antibody and a calcineurin inhibitor may be excessive immunosuppression for pediatric renal transplant recipients.