Systematic review of host genetic association with Covid‐19 prognosis and susceptibility: What have we learned in 2020?

Summary Biomarker identification may provide strategic opportunities to understand disease pathophysiology, predict outcomes, improve human health, and reduce healthcare costs. The highly heterogeneous Covid‐19 clinical manifestation suggests a complex interaction of several different human, viral a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inReviews in Medical Virology Vol. 32; no. 2; pp. e2283 - n/a
Main Authors Araújo, João Locke, Menezes, Diego, Saraiva‐Duarte, Julia Maria, Ferreira, Luciana, Aguiar, Renato, Souza, Renan
Format Journal Article Web Resource
LanguageEnglish
Published England John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.03.2022
Wiley Periodicals Inc
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Summary Biomarker identification may provide strategic opportunities to understand disease pathophysiology, predict outcomes, improve human health, and reduce healthcare costs. The highly heterogeneous Covid‐19 clinical manifestation suggests a complex interaction of several different human, viral and environmental factors. Here, we systematically reviewed genetic association studies evaluating Covid‐19 severity or susceptibility to SARS‐CoV‐2 infection following PRISMA recommendations. Our research comprised papers published until December 31st, 2020, in PubMed and BioRXiv databases focusing on genetic association studies with Covid‐19 prognosis or susceptibility. We found 20 eligible genetic association studies, of which 11 assessed Covid‐19 outcome and 14 evaluated infection susceptibility (five analyzed both effects). Q‐genie assessment indicated moderate quality. Five large‐scale association studies (GWAS, whole‐genome, or exome sequencing) were reported with no consistent replication to date. Promising hits were found on the 3p21.31 region and ABO locus. Candidate gene studies examined ACE1, ACE2, TMPRSS2, IFITM3, APOE, Furin, IFNL3, IFNL4, HLA, TNF‐ɑ genes, and ABO system. The most evaluated single locus was the ABO, and the most sampled region was the HLA with three and five candidate gene studies, respectively. Meta‐analysis could not be performed. Available data showed the need for further reports to replicate claimed associations.
ISSN:1052-9276
1099-1654
DOI:10.1002/rmv.2283