Validation of a capillary zone electrophoresis method for the comparative determination of etoricoxib in pharmaceutical formulations

A CZE method was developed and validated for the analysis of etoricoxib in pharmaceutical dosage forms, using prilocaine as an internal standard. The CZE method was carried out on a fused-silica capillary (50 μm id, effective length 40 cm). The BGE consisted of 25 mM tris-phosphate solution at pH 2....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of separation science Vol. 31; no. 1; pp. 169 - 176
Main Authors Dalmora, Sérgio Luiz, da Silva Sangoi, Maximiliano, da Silva, Lucélia Magalhães, Oliveira Macedo, Rui, Barth, Thiago
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Weinheim Wiley-VCH Verlag 2008
WILEY-VCH Verlag
WILEY‐VCH Verlag
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:A CZE method was developed and validated for the analysis of etoricoxib in pharmaceutical dosage forms, using prilocaine as an internal standard. The CZE method was carried out on a fused-silica capillary (50 μm id, effective length 40 cm). The BGE consisted of 25 mM tris-phosphate solution at pH 2.5. The capillary temperature was maintained at 35°C, the applied voltage was 25 kV, the injection was performed using the pressure mode at 50 mbar for 5 s, with detection at 234 nm using a photodiode array detector. The method was linear in the range of 2-150 μg/mL (r² = 0.9999). The specificity and stability-indicating capability were proven through the degradation studies and showing also that there was no interference of the excipients of the formulation. The accuracy was 99.49% with RSD of 0.66%. The limits of quantitation and detection were 2 and 0.58 μg/mL, respectively. Moreover, method validation demonstrated acceptable results for the precision, sensitivity, and robustness. The proposed method was successfully applied for the quantitative analysis of etoricoxib pharmaceutical formulations, and the results compared to the HPLC and LC-MS/MS methods, showing nonsignificant difference (p >0.05).
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jssc.200700272
ArticleID:JSSC200700272
ark:/67375/WNG-4GF39F5W-7
CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico) - No. 305148/2005-2
istex:3D5FC1B505B35222D7197341D3739F765258A662
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:1615-9306
1615-9314
DOI:10.1002/jssc.200700272