Persistent dyspnea after COVID-19 is not related to cardiopulmonary impairment; a cross-sectional study of persistently dyspneic COVID-19, non-dyspneic COVID-19 and controls

Up to 53% of individuals who had mild COVID-19 experience symptoms for >3-month following infection (Long-CoV). Dyspnea is reported in 60% of Long-CoV cases and may be secondary to impaired exercise capacity (VO ) as a result of pulmonary, pulmonary vascular, or cardiac insult. This study examine...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in physiology Vol. 13; p. 917886
Main Authors Beaudry, Rhys I, Brotto, Andrew R, Varughese, Rhea A, de Waal, Stephanie, Fuhr, Desi P, Damant, Ronald W, Ferrara, Giovanni, Lam, Grace Y, Smith, Maeve P, Stickland, Michael K
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 06.07.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Up to 53% of individuals who had mild COVID-19 experience symptoms for >3-month following infection (Long-CoV). Dyspnea is reported in 60% of Long-CoV cases and may be secondary to impaired exercise capacity (VO ) as a result of pulmonary, pulmonary vascular, or cardiac insult. This study examined whether cardiopulmonary mechanisms could explain exertional dyspnea in Long-CoV. A cross-sectional study of participants with Long-CoV (n = 28, age 40 ± 11 years, 214 ± 85 days post-infection) and age- sex- and body mass index-matched COVID-19 naïve controls (Con, n = 24, age 41 ± 12 years) and participants fully recovered from COVID-19 (ns-CoV, n = 14, age 37 ± 9 years, 198 ± 89 days post-infection) was conducted. Participants self-reported symptoms and baseline dyspnea (modified Medical Research Council, mMRC, dyspnea grade), then underwent a comprehensive pulmonary function test, cardiopulmonary exercise test, exercise pulmonary diffusing capacity measurement, and rest and exercise echocardiography. VO , pulmonary function and cardiac/pulmonary vascular parameters were not impaired in Long- or ns-CoV compared to normative values (VO : 106 ± 25 and 107 ± 25% , respectively) and cardiopulmonary responses to exercise were otherwise normal. When Long-CoV were stratified by clinical dyspnea severity (mMRC = 0 vs mMRC≥1), there were no between-group differences in VO . During submaximal exercise, dyspnea and ventilation were increased in the mMRC≥1 group, despite normal operating lung volumes, arterial saturation, diffusing capacity and indicators of pulmonary vascular pressures. Persistent dyspnea after COVID-19 was not associated with overt cardiopulmonary impairment or exercise intolerance. Interventions focusing on dyspnea management may be appropriate for Long-CoV patients who report dyspnea without cardiopulmonary impairment.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
This article was submitted to Respiratory Physiology and Pathophysiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Physiology
Edited by: Yuanming Luo, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, China
Danilo C. Berton, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Reviewed by: Matiram Pun, University of Calgary, Canada
ISSN:1664-042X
1664-042X
DOI:10.3389/fphys.2022.917886