Higher Residence Attachment and Religiosity Are Associated With Less Depressive Symptoms After Terror Event Exposure

We examined how community type, residence attachment, and religiosity contribute to resilience to depressive symptoms, psychosomatic complaints, residential stress, and avoidance behavior among students exposed to terror. Undergraduate students from Ariel University ( = 1,413; 62.7% females; = 26.5;...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in psychology Vol. 12; p. 760415
Main Authors Korn, Liat, Billig, Miriam, Zukerman, Gil
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 09.12.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We examined how community type, residence attachment, and religiosity contribute to resilience to depressive symptoms, psychosomatic complaints, residential stress, and avoidance behavior among students exposed to terror. Undergraduate students from Ariel University ( = 1,413; 62.7% females; = 26.5; SD = 6.03) completed a self-report questionnaire on socio-demographics, terror exposure, place attachment, and depressive/psychosomatic symptoms. Participants were divided into three residential groups: "Ariel," "Small settlement communities in Judea and Samaria" or "Other places in Israel." Participants from small settlement communities in Judea and Samaria showed significantly fewer depressive symptoms and greater adjustment- less avoidance, psychosomatic symptoms, and residential stress- compared to those living in Ariel or other places in Israel, despite significantly higher exposure to terror. Greater religiosity and residence attachment may protect against depressive symptom development following terror exposure. Secular, temporary residents living in highly terror-exposed areas should be targeted for community strengthening interventions.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Edited by: Arndt Büssing, Witten/Herdecke University, Germany
Reviewed by: Orna Braun-Lewensohn, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel; Avital Laufer, Netanya Academic College, Israel
This article was submitted to Health Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
ISSN:1664-1078
1664-1078
DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.760415