Multichannel DenseNet Architecture for Classification of Mammographic Breast Density for Breast Cancer Detection

Percentage mammographic breast density (MBD) is one of the most notable biomarkers. It is assessed visually with the support of radiologists with the four qualitative Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) categories. It is demanding for radiologists to differentiate between the two varia...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in public health Vol. 10; p. 885212
Main Authors Pawar, Shivaji D, Sharma, Kamal K, Sapate, Suhas G, Yadav, Geetanjali Y, Alroobaea, Roobaea, Alzahrani, Sabah M, Hedabou, Mustapha
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 25.04.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Percentage mammographic breast density (MBD) is one of the most notable biomarkers. It is assessed visually with the support of radiologists with the four qualitative Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) categories. It is demanding for radiologists to differentiate between the two variably allocated BIRADS classes, namely, "BIRADS C and BIRADS D." Recently, convolution neural networks have been found superior in classification tasks due to their ability to extract local features with shared weight architecture and space invariance characteristics. The proposed study intends to examine an artificial intelligence (AI)-based MBD classifier toward developing a latent computer-assisted tool for radiologists to distinguish the BIRADS class in modern clinical progress. This article proposes a multichannel DenseNet architecture for MBD classification. The proposed architecture consists of four-channel DenseNet transfer learning architecture to extract significant features from a single patient's two a mediolateral oblique (MLO) and two craniocaudal (CC) views of digital mammograms. The performance of the proposed classifier is evaluated using 200 cases consisting of 800 digital mammograms of the different BIRADS density classes with validated density ground truth. The classifier's performance is assessed with quantitative metrics such as precision, responsiveness, specificity, and the area under the curve (AUC). The concluding preliminary outcomes reveal that this intended multichannel model has delivered good performance with an accuracy of 96.67% during training and 90.06% during testing and an average AUC of 0.9625. Obtained results are also validated qualitatively with the help of a radiologist expert in the field of MBD. Proposed architecture achieved state-of-the-art results with a fewer number of images and with less computation power.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
This article was submitted to Digital Public Health, a section of the journal Frontiers in Public Health
Edited by: Thippa Reddy Gadekallu, VIT University, India
Reviewed by: Clement Nyirenda, University of the Western Cape, South Africa; Xiao-Zhi Gao, University of Eastern Finland, Finland
ISSN:2296-2565
2296-2565
DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2022.885212