Activation Phenotype of Mycobacterium tuberculosis-Specific CD4+ T Cells Promoting the Discrimination Between Active Tuberculosis and Latent Tuberculosis Infection

Rapid and effective discrimination between active tuberculosis (ATB) and latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) remains a challenge. There is an urgent need for developing practical and affordable approaches targeting this issue. Participants with ATB and LTBI were recruited at Tongji Hospital (Qiaoko...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in immunology Vol. 12; p. 721013
Main Authors Luo, Ying, Xue, Ying, Mao, Liyan, Lin, Qun, Tang, Guoxing, Song, Huijuan, Liu, Wei, Tong, Shutao, Hou, Hongyan, Huang, Min, Ouyang, Renren, Wang, Feng, Sun, Ziyong
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 26.08.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Rapid and effective discrimination between active tuberculosis (ATB) and latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) remains a challenge. There is an urgent need for developing practical and affordable approaches targeting this issue. Participants with ATB and LTBI were recruited at Tongji Hospital (Qiaokou cohort) and Sino-French New City Hospital (Caidian cohort) based on positive T-SPOT results from June 2020 to January 2021. The expression of activation markers including HLA-DR, CD38, CD69, and CD25 was examined on (MTB)-specific CD4 T cells defined by IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-2 expression upon MTB antigen stimulation. A total of 90 (40 ATB and 50 LTBI) and another 64 (29 ATB and 35 LTBI) subjects were recruited from the Qiaokou cohort and Caidian cohort, respectively. The expression patterns of Th1 cytokines including IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-2 upon MTB antigen stimulation could not differentiate ATB patients from LTBI individuals well. However, both HLA-DR and CD38 on MTB-specific cells showed discriminatory value in distinguishing between ATB patients and LTBI individuals. As for developing a single candidate biomarker, HLA-DR had the advantage over CD38. Moreover, HLA-DR on TNF-α or IL-2 cells had superiority over that on IFN-γ cells in differentiating ATB patients from LTBI individuals. Besides, HLA-DR on MTB-specific cells defined by multiple cytokine co-expression had a higher ability to discriminate patients with ATB from LTBI individuals than that of MTB-specific cells defined by one kind of cytokine expression. Specially, HLA-DR on TNF-α IL-2 cells produced an AUC of 0.901 (95% CI, 0.833-0.969), with a sensitivity of 93.75% (95% CI, 79.85-98.27%) and specificity of 72.97% (95% CI, 57.02-84.60%) as a threshold of 44% was used. Furthermore, the performance of HLA-DR on TNF-α IL-2 cells for differential diagnosis was obtained with validation cohort data: 90.91% (95% CI, 72.19-97.47%) sensitivity and 68.97% (95% CI, 50.77-82.73%) specificity. We demonstrated that HLA-DR on MTB-specific cells was a potentially useful biomarker for accurate discrimination between ATB and LTBI.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
This article was submitted to Microbial Immunology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Immunology
Reviewed by: Marco Pio La Manna, University of Palermo, Italy; Elisa Nemes, University of Cape Town, South Africa
Edited by: Harriet Mayanja Kizza, Makerere University, Uganda
ISSN:1664-3224
1664-3224
DOI:10.3389/fimmu.2021.721013