Therapist Attachment and the Working Alliance: The Moderating Effect of Emotional Regulation

To explore whether the therapist's emotional regulation strategies moderate the relationship between therapist attachment and the working alliance from the therapist's perspective. A non-experimental, descriptive correlational design was used. Sixty-three psychotherapists (6 men, 57 women)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in psychology Vol. 12; p. 784010
Main Authors Ruiz-Aranda, Desireé, Cardoso-Álvarez, Sara, Fenollar-Cortés, Javier
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 10.12.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To explore whether the therapist's emotional regulation strategies moderate the relationship between therapist attachment and the working alliance from the therapist's perspective. A non-experimental, descriptive correlational design was used. Sixty-three psychotherapists (6 men, 57 women) participated in this study, ranging in age from 27 to 69 years, with a mean age of 39.3 years. The therapists completed the Attachment evaluation questionnaire for adults, the Spanish Adaptation of the Working Alliance Inventory, and the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale. Associations between attachment and emotional regulation traits and working alliance were examined using multilevel modeling, controlling for therapist demographics, and clinical experience. Moderation analyses revealed significant interaction effects between therapist attachment and emotional regulation strategies. Attachment styles would not significantly affect the therapist's ability to establish an adequate therapeutic alliance bond. The results show that the attachment style of the therapists interacted with their emotional regulation abilities.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Edited by: Emily K. Sandoz, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, United States
This article was submitted to Psychology for Clinical Settings, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
Reviewed by: Luis Botella, Ramon Llull University, Spain; Rachele Mariani, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
ISSN:1664-1078
1664-1078
DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.784010