The Comparison of Plasma and Cerebrospinal Fluid R(−)- and S(+)-Flurbiprofen Concentration After Intravenous Injection of Flurbiprofen Axetil in Human Subjects

Background: Flurbiprofen axetil is a prodrug that releases the active substance through enzymatic removal of the ester moiety. It is formulated through encapsulation in a lipid microsphere carrier, and widely used to treat perioperative pain. Here, we studied the distribution of R (−)- and S (+)-flu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in pharmacology Vol. 12; p. 646196
Main Authors Yao, Han, Luo, Xingxian, Zhang, Hong, An, Haiyan, Feng, Wanyu, Feng, Yi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 30.04.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1663-9812
1663-9812
DOI10.3389/fphar.2021.646196

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background: Flurbiprofen axetil is a prodrug that releases the active substance through enzymatic removal of the ester moiety. It is formulated through encapsulation in a lipid microsphere carrier, and widely used to treat perioperative pain. Here, we studied the distribution of R (−)- and S (+)-flurbiprofen in human plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) after intravenous injection of flurbiprofen axetil. Methods: A total of 70 adult patients undergoing elective lower limb surgery under spinal anesthesia were given a single intravenous injection of 100-mg flurbiprofen axetil. The patients were randomly assigned to 10 groups for plasma and CSF sampling at 10 time points (5–50 min) after subarachnoid puncture and before actual spinal anesthesia. R (−)- and S (+)-flurbiprofen and CSF/plasma ratio were determined by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Results: R (−)-flurbiprofen concentration ranged from 2.01 to 10.9 μg/mL in plasma and 1.46–34.4 ng/mL in CSF. S (+)-flurbiprofen concentration ranged from 1.18 to 10.8 μg/mL in plasma and from 2.53 to 47 ng/mL in CSF. In comparison to S (+)-flurbiprofen, R (−)-flurbiprofen concentration was significantly higher in plasma at all time points ( p < 0.05) except at 30 or 40 min, and lower in CSF at all time points ( p < 0.05) except at 10, 15 and 40 min. Analysis after correcting drug concentration for body mass index also revealed higher plasma and lower CSF R (−)-flurbiprofen concentration. In comparison to S (+)-flurbiprofen, AUC 0–50 for R (−)-flurbiprofen was larger in plasma and smaller in CSF ( p < 0.05 for both), and accordingly smaller CSF/plasma AUC 0–50 ratio ( p < 0.05). There was a positive correlation between R (−)-flurbiprofen concentration and S (+)-flurbiprofen concentration in plasma (r = 0.725, p < 0.001) as well as in CSF (r = 0.718, p < 0.001), and a negative correlation between plasma and CSF concentration of S (+)-flurbiprofen (r = −0.250, p = 0.037), but not R (−)-flurbiprofen. Conclusion: Distribution of R (−)- and S (+)-flurbiprofen in plasma and CSF differed significantly. Penetration of R (−)-flurbiprofen into the CNS was lower than S (+)-flurbiprofen.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Edited by: Yoseph Caraco, Hadassah Medical Center, Israel
This article was submitted to Drug Metabolism and Transport, a section of the journal Frontiers in Pharmacology
Mojca Kržan, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia
These authors have contributed equally to this work.
Reviewed by: Andrei Medvedovici, University of Bucharest, Romania
ISSN:1663-9812
1663-9812
DOI:10.3389/fphar.2021.646196