Effect of Home Enteral Nutritional Support Compared With Normal Oral Diet in Postoperative Subjects With Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Resection: A Meta-Analysis
We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the influence of a home enteral nutritional support compared with a normal oral diet in postoperative subjects with upper gastrointestinal cancer resection. A systematic literature search up to December 2021 was done and 23 studies included 3,010 subjects wit...
Saved in:
Published in | Frontiers in surgery Vol. 9; p. 844475 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Switzerland
Frontiers Media S.A
18.02.2022
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the influence of a home enteral nutritional support compared with a normal oral diet in postoperative subjects with upper gastrointestinal cancer resection.
A systematic literature search up to December 2021 was done and 23 studies included 3,010 subjects with upper gastrointestinal cancer resection at the start of the study; 1,556 of them were given home enteral nutritional support and 1,454 were normal oral diet. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) with 95% CIs to evaluate the influence of home enteral nutritional support compared with a normal oral diet in postoperative subjects with upper gastrointestinal cancer resection by the dichotomous or continuous methods with a random or fixed-influence model.
Home enteral nutritional support had significantly higher quality of life (MD, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.50-2.67,
< 0.001), better body weight change (MD, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.31-2.43,
< 0.001), higher albumin (MD, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.72-1.82,
< 0.001), and higher pre-albumin (MD, 30.79; 95% CI, 7.29-54.29,
= 0.01) compared to the normal oral diet in subjects with upper gastrointestinal cancer resection. However, home enteral nutritional support had no significant impact on the hemoglobin (MD, 4.64; 95% CI, -4.17 to 13.46,
= 0.30), and complications (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.76-1.40,
= 0.83) compared to the normal oral diet in subjects with upper gastrointestinal cancer resection.
Home enteral nutritional support had a significantly higher quality of life, better body weight change, higher albumin, and higher pre-albumin, and had no significant impact on the hemoglobin and complications compared to the normal oral diet in subjects with upper gastrointestinal cancer resection. Further studies are required. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Undefined-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 This article was submitted to Visceral Surgery, a section of the journal Frontiers in Surgery Edited by: Mauro Podda, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Cagliari, Italy These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship Reviewed by: Kalliopi-Anna Poulia, Agricultural University of Athens, Greece; Gaetano Poillucci, Ospedale San Giovanni Evangelista, Italy |
ISSN: | 2296-875X 2296-875X |
DOI: | 10.3389/fsurg.2022.844475 |