Effect of Home Enteral Nutritional Support Compared With Normal Oral Diet in Postoperative Subjects With Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Resection: A Meta-Analysis

We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the influence of a home enteral nutritional support compared with a normal oral diet in postoperative subjects with upper gastrointestinal cancer resection. A systematic literature search up to December 2021 was done and 23 studies included 3,010 subjects wit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in surgery Vol. 9; p. 844475
Main Authors Liu, Fang, Pan, Xuling, Zhao, SuQing, Ren, RuiJun, Chang, GuiXia, Mao, Yu
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 18.02.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the influence of a home enteral nutritional support compared with a normal oral diet in postoperative subjects with upper gastrointestinal cancer resection. A systematic literature search up to December 2021 was done and 23 studies included 3,010 subjects with upper gastrointestinal cancer resection at the start of the study; 1,556 of them were given home enteral nutritional support and 1,454 were normal oral diet. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) with 95% CIs to evaluate the influence of home enteral nutritional support compared with a normal oral diet in postoperative subjects with upper gastrointestinal cancer resection by the dichotomous or continuous methods with a random or fixed-influence model. Home enteral nutritional support had significantly higher quality of life (MD, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.50-2.67, < 0.001), better body weight change (MD, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.31-2.43, < 0.001), higher albumin (MD, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.72-1.82, < 0.001), and higher pre-albumin (MD, 30.79; 95% CI, 7.29-54.29, = 0.01) compared to the normal oral diet in subjects with upper gastrointestinal cancer resection. However, home enteral nutritional support had no significant impact on the hemoglobin (MD, 4.64; 95% CI, -4.17 to 13.46, = 0.30), and complications (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.76-1.40, = 0.83) compared to the normal oral diet in subjects with upper gastrointestinal cancer resection. Home enteral nutritional support had a significantly higher quality of life, better body weight change, higher albumin, and higher pre-albumin, and had no significant impact on the hemoglobin and complications compared to the normal oral diet in subjects with upper gastrointestinal cancer resection. Further studies are required.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Undefined-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
This article was submitted to Visceral Surgery, a section of the journal Frontiers in Surgery
Edited by: Mauro Podda, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Cagliari, Italy
These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship
Reviewed by: Kalliopi-Anna Poulia, Agricultural University of Athens, Greece; Gaetano Poillucci, Ospedale San Giovanni Evangelista, Italy
ISSN:2296-875X
2296-875X
DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2022.844475