Creating Illusions of Past Encounter Through Brief Exposure

Titchener (1928) suggested that briefly glancing at a scene could make it appear strangely familiar when it was fully processed moments later. The closest laboratory demonstration used words as stimuli, and showed that briefly glancing at a to-be-judged word increased the subject's belief that...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPsychological science Vol. 20; no. 5; pp. 534 - 538
Main Authors Brown, Alan S., Marsh, Elizabeth J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Los Angeles, CA Wiley Periodicals 01.05.2009
SAGE Publications
SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Titchener (1928) suggested that briefly glancing at a scene could make it appear strangely familiar when it was fully processed moments later. The closest laboratory demonstration used words as stimuli, and showed that briefly glancing at a to-be-judged word increased the subject's belief that it had been presented in an earlier study list (Jacoby & Whitehouse, 1989). We evaluated whether a hasty glance could elicit a false belief in a prior encounter, from a time and place outside of the experiment.This goal precluded using word stimuli, so we had subjects evaluate unfamiliar symbols. Each symbol was preceded by a brief exposure to an identical symbol, a different symbol, or no symbol. A brief glance at an identical symbol increased attributions to preexperimental experience, relative to a glance at a different symbol or no symbol, providing a possible mechanism for common illusions of false recognition.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0956-7976
1467-9280
1467-9280
DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02337.x