Systemic and Mucosal B and T Cell Responses Upon Mucosal Vaccination of Teleost Fish

The development of mucosal vaccines against pathogens is currently a highly explored area of research in both humans and animals. This is due to the fact that mucosal vaccines have the potential to best elicit protective responses at these mucosal surfaces, which represent the frontline of host defe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in immunology Vol. 11; p. 622377
Main Authors Muñoz-Atienza, Estefanía, Díaz-Rosales, Patricia, Tafalla, Carolina
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 16.02.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The development of mucosal vaccines against pathogens is currently a highly explored area of research in both humans and animals. This is due to the fact that mucosal vaccines have the potential to best elicit protective responses at these mucosal surfaces, which represent the frontline of host defense, thus blocking the pathogen at its initial replication sites. However, in order to provide an efficient long-lasting protection, these mucosal vaccines have to be capable of eliciting an adequate systemic immune response in addition to local responses. In aquaculture, the need for mucosal vaccines has further practical implications, as these vaccines would avoid the individual manipulation of fish out of the water, being beneficial from both an economic and animal welfare point of view. However, how B and T cells are organized in teleost fish within these mucosal sites and how they respond to mucosally delivered antigens varies greatly when compared to mammals. For this reason, it is important to establish which mucosally delivered antigens have the capacity to induce strong and long-lasting B and T cell responses. Hence, in this review, we have summarized what is currently known regarding the adaptive immune mechanisms that are induced both locally and systemically in fish after mucosal immunization through different routes of administration including oral and nasal vaccination, anal intubation and immersion vaccination. Finally, based on the data presented, we discuss how mucosal vaccination strategies could be improved to reach significant protection levels in these species.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
This article was submitted to Comparative Immunology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Immunology
Reviewed by: Uwe Fischer, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institute, Germany; Chao Li, Qingdao Agricultural University, China
Edited by: Nan Wu, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China
Present address: Estefanía Muñoz-Atienza, Grupo de Seguridad y Calidad de los Alimentos por Bacterias Lácticas, Bacteriocinas y Probióticos (Grupo SEGABALBP), Sección Departamental de Nutrición y Ciencia de los Alimentos (Nutrición, Bromatología, Higiene y Seguridad Alimentaria), Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
ISSN:1664-3224
1664-3224
DOI:10.3389/fimmu.2020.622377