A factor model of the functional psychoses and the relationship of factors to clinical variables and brain morphology

Background. Despite more than 100 years of study, there remains no definitive diagnostic validation of the functional psychoses. Factor analysis suggests the presence of three or more psychopathological syndromes in functional psychoses as a whole. The relationship between these factors and cerebral...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPsychological medicine Vol. 31; no. 1; pp. 159 - 171
Main Authors McINTOSH, A. M., FORRESTER, A., LAWRIE, S. M., BYRNE, M., HARPER, A., KESTELMAN, J. N., BEST, J. J. K., MILLER, P., JOHNSTONE, E. C., OWENS, D. G. C.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cambridge Cambridge University Press 01.01.2001
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background. Despite more than 100 years of study, there remains no definitive diagnostic validation of the functional psychoses. Factor analysis suggests the presence of three or more psychopathological syndromes in functional psychoses as a whole. The relationship between these factors and cerebral anatomy has been investigated in schizophrenia only. This study aimed to address the relationship of symptom factors to clinically important variables and cerebral anatomy in a sample of psychotic patients with a spread of diagnoses. Methods. In a sample of patients with functional psychoses, symptom data was obtained on four consecutive admissions using the OPCRIT symptom checklist. OPCRIT data was used to generate operational diagnoses in accordance with pre-set criteria and a principle components analysis was performed on symptom data. Factor loadings were compared between each admission to examine factor stability over time. Factor scores at first admission were also correlated with clinical variables obtained from patients' case notes. From the sample of 204 patients, 64 subjects were recruited and underwent an MRI scan of the brain. Regional anatomical volumes were compared with diagnosis and factor loadings at first admission. Results. A principal components analysis gave a four-factor solution of ‘manic’, ‘depressive’, ‘disorganization’ and ‘reality distortion’ factors at each admission. Factors showed a high degree of stability over the four admissions studied. The factors were significantly associated with several clinical variables. Three of the four factors were associated with a specific pattern of cerebral anatomy. Conclusions. This study suggests that factors may correspond to relatively specific disease processes underlying functional psychotic illness. We propose that the use of symptom factors may facilitate the investigation of the underlying mechanisms of psychotic illness.
Bibliography:istex:25274A6B5B9584FC6F9DD45B523E32A67132D31B
ark:/67375/6GQ-7MKWHQ2P-H
PII:S0033291799003177
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0033-2917
1469-8978
DOI:10.1017/S0033291799003177