Habituation and Dishabituation in Motor Behavior: Experiment and Neural Dynamic Model

• Published in: Frontiers in psychology Vol. 13; p. 717669
• Main Authors: Aerdker, Sophie, Feng, Jing, Schöner, Gregor
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 08.04.2022
• Subjects: Dynamic Field Theory; exploration-exploitation; habituation; neural dynamic model; perseveration; Psychology; neural dynamic model; exploration-exploitation; Dynamic Field Theory; habituation; perseveration
• ISSN: 1664-1078; 1664-1078
• DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.717669

Does motor behavior early in development have the same signatures of habituation, dishabituation, and Spencer-Thompson dishabituation known from infant perception and cognition? And do these signatures explain the choice preferences in A not B motor decision tasks? We provide new empirical evidence that gives an affirmative answer to the first question together with a unified neural dynamic model that gives an affirmative answer to the second question.In the perceptual and cognitive domains, habituation is the weakening of an orientation response to a stimulus over perceptual experience. Switching to a novel stimulus leads to dishabituation, the re-establishment of the orientation response. In Spencer-Thompson dishabituation, the renewed orientation response transfers to the original (familiar) stimulus. The change in orientation responses over perceptual experience explains infants' behavior in preferential looking tasks: Familiarity preference (looking longer at familiar than at novel stimuli) early during exposure and novelty preference (looking longer at novel than at familiar stimuli) late during exposure. In the motor domain, perseveration in the A not B task could be interpreted as a form of familiarity preference. There are hints that this preference reverses after enough experience with the familiar movement. We provide a unified account for habituation and patterns of preferential selection in which neural dynamic fields generate perceptual or motor representations. The build-up of activation in excitatory fields leads to familiarity preference, the build-up of activation in inhibitory fields leads to novelty preference. We show that the model accounts for the new experimental evidence for motor habituation, but is also compatible with earlier accounts for perceptual habituation and motor perseveration. We discuss how excitatory and inhibitory memory traces may regulate exploration and exploitation for both orientation to objects and motor behaviors.