How Do Mobile Social Apps Matter for College Students' Satisfaction in Group-Based Learning? The Mediation of Collaborative Learning

Recently, many universities apply mobile tools to teaching practices. For instance, some teachers may set up groups on mobile social apps and assign course tasks and advise college students to submit papers online. Nevertheless, how these mobile social apps affect teaching practices, especially the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in psychology Vol. 13; p. 795660
Main Authors Wang, Xuyan, Zhang, Renyu, Wang, Xiaojiong, Xu, Dongming, Tian, Fangqing
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 25.02.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Recently, many universities apply mobile tools to teaching practices. For instance, some teachers may set up groups on mobile social apps and assign course tasks and advise college students to submit papers online. Nevertheless, how these mobile social apps affect teaching practices, especially the process of students' satisfaction needs to be further explored. To fill this research gap, we build a theoretical model of how mobile social apps' functions affect course satisfaction from the perspective of Media Richness theory and the Uses and Gratifications (U and G) theory. A total of 186 valid questionnaires from college students in China were collected, and a structural equation model was built to test our research model. The results show that as: (1) only the communication function has positive impacts on knowledge sharing, while the impact of the information storing function and information distribution function on knowledge sharing is not significant; (2) knowledge sharing does not affect course satisfaction in a direct way, but it can act indirectly through promoting collaborative learning, which shows the mediating role of collaborative learning. The theoretical implications and practical implications of the study are discussed.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
This article was submitted to Educational Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
Reviewed by: Elizabeth A. Boyle, University of the West of Scotland, United Kingdom; Cesar Collazos, University of Cauca, Colombia
Edited by: David Gonzalez-Gomez, University of Extremadura, Spain
ISSN:1664-1078
1664-1078
DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.795660