Parieto-frontal Interactions in Visual-object and Visual-spatial Working Memory: Evidence from Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

This study aimed to investigate whether transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can induce selective working memory (WM) deficits of visual-object versus visual-spatial information in normal humans. Thirty-five healthy subjects performed two computerized visual n-back tasks, in which they were requi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. 1991) Vol. 11; no. 7; pp. 606 - 618
Main Authors Oliveri, M., Turriziani, P., Carlesimo, G.A., Koch, G., Tomaiuolo, F., Panella, M., Caltagirone, C.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Oxford University Press 01.07.2001
Oxford Publishing Limited (England)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1047-3211
1460-2199
DOI10.1093/cercor/11.7.606

Cover

More Information
Summary:This study aimed to investigate whether transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can induce selective working memory (WM) deficits of visual-object versus visual-spatial information in normal humans. Thirty-five healthy subjects performed two computerized visual n-back tasks, in which they were required to memorize spatial locations or abstract patterns. In a first series of experiments, unilateral or bilateral TMS was delivered on posterior parietal and middle temporal regions of both hemispheres after various delays during the WM task. Bilateral temporal TMS increased reaction times (RTs) in the visual-object, whereas bilateral parietal TMS selectively increased RTs in the visual-spatial WM task. These effects were evident at a delay of 300 ms. Response accuracy was not affected by bilateral or unilateral TMS of either cortical region. In a second group of experiments, bilateral TMS was applied over the superior frontal gyrus (SFG) or the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). TMS of the SFG selectively increased RTs in the visual-spatial WM task, whereas TMS of the DLPFC interfered with both WM tasks, in terms of both accuracy and RTs. These effects were evident when TMS was applied after a delay of 600 ms, but not one of 300 ms. These findings confirm the segregation of WM buffers for object and spatial information in the posterior cortical regions. In the frontal cortex, the DLPFC appears to be necessary for WM computations regardless of the stimulus material.
Bibliography:PII:1460-2199
local:0110606
ark:/67375/HXZ-DKRDFQ49-6
istex:3518828A06A27E048BF36D8309569CC73D5E94EB
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1047-3211
1460-2199
DOI:10.1093/cercor/11.7.606