Cardiac sequelae after COVID-19: Results of a 1-year follow-up study with echocardiography and biomarkers

To evaluate the need for cardiac monitoring in unselected patients recovered from COVID-19 and to estimate the risk of heart complications after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). During March 2020 and January 2021, 106 patients who had recovered from SARS-CoV-2 (alpha and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine Vol. 9; p. 1067943
Main Authors Matejova, Gabriela, Radvan, Martin, Bartecku, Elis, Kamenik, Martin, Koc, Lumir, Horinkova, Jana, Sykorova, Lubica, Stepanova, Radka, Kala, Petr
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 21.12.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To evaluate the need for cardiac monitoring in unselected patients recovered from COVID-19 and to estimate the risk of heart complications after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). During March 2020 and January 2021, 106 patients who had recovered from SARS-CoV-2 (alpha and beta variants) were enrolled in prospective observational cohort study CoSuBr (Covid Survivals in Brno). The diagnosis was based on a reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction swab test of the upper respiratory tract. Demographic parameters, patient history, clinical evaluation, cardiac biomarkers, ECG and echocardiography were recorded during three visits (Visit 1 at least 6 weeks after infection, Visit 2 three months later, and Visit 3 one year after Visit 1). 58.5% of the study group ( = 106) were female, while the mean age was 46 years (range 18-77 years). The mean time interval between the onset of infection and the follow-up visit was 107 days. One quarter (24.5%) of the patients required hospitalization during the acute phase of the disease; the rest recovered at home. 74% suffered a mild form of the disease, with 4.8, 18.1, and 2.9% suffering moderate, severe, and critical forms, respectively. At the time of enrolment, 64.2% of the patients reported persistent symptoms, while more than half of the whole group (50.9%) mentioned at least one symptom of possible cardiac origin (breathing problems, palpitations, exercise intolerance, fatigue). In the 1-year follow-up after COVID-19 infection, left ventricle ejection fraction showed no significant decrease [median (IQR) change was -1.0 (-6.0; 4.0)%, = 0.150], and there were no changes of troponin (mean change -0.1 ± 1.72 ng/L; = 0.380) or NT-proBNP [median (IQR) change 2.0 (-20.0; 29.0) pg/mL; = 0.315]. There was a mild decrease in right ventricle end diastolic diameter (-mean change 2.3 ± 5.61 mm, < 0.001), while no right ventricle dysfunction was detected. There was very mild progress in left ventricle diastolic diameter [median (IQR) change 1.0 (-1.0; 4.0) mm; = 0.001] between V1 and V3, mild enlargement of the left atrium (mean change 1.2 ± 4.17 mm; = 0.021) and a non-significant trend to impairment of left ventricle diastolic dysfunction. There was a mild change in pulmonary artery systolic pressure [median (IQR) change 3.0 (-2.0; 8.0) mmHg; = 0.038]. Despite a lot of information regarding cardiac impairment due to SARS-CoV2, our study does not suggest an increased risk for developing clinically significant heart changes during the 1-year follow-up. Based on our results, routine echocardiography and biomarkers collection is currently not recommended after COVID-19 recovery.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Reviewed by: Jia Guo, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, China; Ferdinando Loiacono, Humanitas Research Hospital, Italy
This article was submitted to Clinical and Translational Cardiovascular Medicine, a section of the journal Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Edited by: Baohui Xu, Stanford University, United States
ISSN:2297-055X
2297-055X
DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2022.1067943