Erlotinib versus gefitinib for brain metastases in Asian patients with exon 19 EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma: a retrospective, multicenter study

The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of Erlotinib versus Gefitinib in the treatment of Asian patients with exon 19 EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma and newly diagnosed brain metastases. Consecutive Asian patients with exon 19 EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma and newly diagnosed b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBMC pulmonary medicine Vol. 18; no. 1; p. 171
Main Authors Jiang, Ye, Zhang, Jing, Huang, Juanjuan, Xu, Bo, Li, Ning, Cao, Lei, Zhao, Mingdong
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BioMed Central 20.11.2018
BMC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of Erlotinib versus Gefitinib in the treatment of Asian patients with exon 19 EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma and newly diagnosed brain metastases. Consecutive Asian patients with exon 19 EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma and newly diagnosed brain metastases were identified and initially received peroral administration of 150 mg/d erlotinib or 250 mg/d gefitinib during 2009-2015. Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the second endpoint. The cohort consisted of 227 Asian patients (erlotinib-treated cohort: n = 112, mean age = 58.5 years [SD: 20.13]; gefitinib-treated cohort: n = 115, mean age = 58.4 years [SD: 19.52]). In a multivariate analysis controlling for age, sex and time span of smoking history, significant difference was detected in the 36-month OS between erlotinib and gefitinib groups (58.3% vs. 49.1%, p = 0.012). There was also significant difference in the 36-month PFS between erlotinib and gefitinib groups (64% vs. 53%, p = 0.013). For Asian patients with exon 19 EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma and brain metastases, erlotinib was associated with a significantly longer OS and a more prolonged PFS and compared with gefitinib.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1471-2466
1471-2466
DOI:10.1186/s12890-018-0734-1