Clinical Application of AMH Measurement in Assisted Reproduction

Anti-Müllerian hormone reflects the continuum of the functional ovarian reserve, and as such can predict ovarian response to gonadotropin stimulation and be used to individualize treatment pathways to improve efficacy and safety. However, consistent with other biomarkers and age-based prediction mod...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in endocrinology (Lausanne) Vol. 11; p. 606744
Main Authors Li, Hang Wun Raymond, Nelson, Scott M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 09.12.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Anti-Müllerian hormone reflects the continuum of the functional ovarian reserve, and as such can predict ovarian response to gonadotropin stimulation and be used to individualize treatment pathways to improve efficacy and safety. However, consistent with other biomarkers and age-based prediction models it has limited ability to predict live birth and should not be used to refuse treatment, but rather to inform counselling and shared decision making. The use of absolute clinical thresholds to stratify patient phenotypes, assess discordance and individualize treatment protocols in non-validated algorithms combined with the lack of standardization of assays may result in inappropriate classification and sub-optimal clinical decision making. We propose that holistic baseline phenotyping, incorporating antral follicle count and other patient characteristics is critical. Treatment decisions driven by validated algorithms that use ovarian reserve biomarkers as continuous measures, reducing the risk of misclassification, are likely to improve overall outcomes for our patients.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
Edited by: Gedis Grudzinskas, Private Practitioner, London, United Kingdom
This article was submitted to Reproduction, a section of the journal Frontiers in Endocrinology
Reviewed by: Antonio La Marca, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy; Ilpo Huhtaniemi, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
ISSN:1664-2392
1664-2392
DOI:10.3389/fendo.2020.606744