A new quality index for benchmarking of different cellulose nanofibrils

•Multi-criteria method to obtain an unique quantitative grade.•Influence of pulp, refining, and hemicellulose content on the defibrillation process is highlighted.•The quality index method allows for the benchmarking of commercial nanocellulose products.•In addition to the complete quality index, a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCarbohydrate polymers Vol. 174; pp. 318 - 329
Main Authors Desmaisons, Johanna, Boutonnet, Elisa, Rueff, Martine, Dufresne, Alain, Bras, Julien
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Ltd 15.10.2017
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•Multi-criteria method to obtain an unique quantitative grade.•Influence of pulp, refining, and hemicellulose content on the defibrillation process is highlighted.•The quality index method allows for the benchmarking of commercial nanocellulose products.•In addition to the complete quality index, a simplified and faster version is also proposed. From a single plant source, a wide range of mechanically-deconstructed cellulose nanomaterials can be obtained due to the large number of possible combinations of pre-treatments, mechanical disintegration process, and post-treatments. It leads to the existence of a variety of cellulose nanofibrils with different shapes, morphologies, and properties on the market. The resulting material is actually a complex mixture of nanoscale particles, microfibrillated fibers, and residual fibers on the millimeter scale. Defining a “degree of fibrillation” for determining the final cellulose nanofibril quality is a challenging issue. This study proposes a multi-criteria method to obtain the quality index of cellulose nanofibril suspensions under the form of a unique quantitative grade. According to this method, the influence of different parameters such as pulp conditioning, refining, and hemicellulose content on the defibrillation process is highlighted. This method also allows for the benchmarking of different commercial nanocellulose products.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0144-8617
1879-1344
DOI:10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.06.032