Spatial and Simultaneous Seroprevalence of Anti- Leptospira Antibodies in Owners and Their Domiciled Dogs in a Major City of Southern Brazil

• Published in: Frontiers in veterinary science Vol. 7; p. 580400
• Main Authors: Benitez, Aline do Nascimento, Monica, Thais Cabral, Miura, Ana Carolina, Romanelli, Micheline Sahyun, Giordano, Lucienne Garcia Pretto, Freire, Roberta Lemos, Mitsuka-Breganó, Regina, Martins, Camila Marinelli, Biondo, Alexander Welker, Serrano, Isabela Machado, Lopes, Thiago Henrique Carneiro Rios, Reis, Renato Barbosa, Gomes, Jancarlo Ferreira, Costa, Federico, Wunder, Elsio, Ko, Albert Icksang, Navarro, Italmar Teodorico
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 08.01.2021
• Subjects: epidemiology; kernell analysis; One Health; serovar; Veterinary Science; zoonosis; serovar; epidemiology; kernell analysis; zoonosis; One Health
• ISSN: 2297-1769; 2297-1769
• DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2020.580400

Although leptospirosis has been considered a major concern in urban areas, no study to date has spatially and simultaneously compared both owner and dog serology in households of major cities. Accordingly, the aim of the present study was to assess the seroprevalence of antibodies, evaluate associated risk factors and conduct spatial analyses in 565 randomly selected households, which included 597 dog owners and 729 dogs in Londrina, Southern Brazil. Seropositivity by MAT were detected in in 11/597 (1.84%) owners and in 155/729 (21.26%) dogs. The risk factors were evaluated with logistic regression analysis and spatial factors and case distribution were evaluated with kernel density analyses. The sera of 14/155 (9.03%) dogs reacted for more than one serovar with the same titer. Canicola was the most frequent serogroup, detected in 3/11 (27.27%) owners and 76/155 (49.03%) dogs. The highest titer among the owners was 1:3,200 and was detected in the same household with a titer of 1:800 in the dog. Simultaneous owner-dog seropositivity was found in 7/565 (1.23%) households, with three reacted against serogroup Canicola. Positive owners were detected in 4/565 (0.70%) households and positive dogs were detected in 141/565 (24.95%) households. The associated risks of infection for dogs were different from those associated with infection in owners. Risk analyses for Canicola also identified specific factors of infection. Regardless of owner and dog cases were not statistically clustered, the kernel map has shown dog positivity occurrence in the same hot locations and near positive owners. The dependent variable analysis and logit model suggested a greater likelihood of peri-domiciliary contact with . In conclusion, exposure to infection was significantly higher in dogs than in their owners and human cases spatially overlapped dog cases, implicating dogs as potential environmental sentinels for this disease. In addition, the associated risk may vary according to serogroup, and the observed simultaneous Canicola seropositivity of owner and dog has suggested intradomicile-transmitted infection.