The Lack of Sex, Age, and Anthropometric Diversity in Neck Biomechanical Data

• Published in: Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology Vol. 9; p. 684217
• Main Authors: Booth, Gabrielle R., Cripton, Peter A., Siegmund, Gunter P.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 17.08.2021
• Subjects: ageing; Bioengineering and Biotechnology; injury biomechanics; injury prevention; neck; obesity; population diversity; ageing; population diversity; anthropometric differences; injury biomechanics; injury prevention; neck; obesity; sex differences
• ISSN: 2296-4185; 2296-4185
• DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.684217

Female, elderly, and obese individuals are at greater risk than male, young, and non-obese individuals for neck injury in otherwise equivalent automotive collisions. The development of effective safety technologies to protect all occupants requires high quality data from a range of biomechanical test subjects representative of the population at risk. Here we sought to quantify the demographic characteristics of the volunteers and post-mortem human subjects (PMHSs) used to create the available biomechanical data for the human neck during automotive impacts. A systematic literature and database search was conducted to identify kinematic data that could be used to characterize the neck response to inertial loading or direct head/body impacts. We compiled the sex, age, height, weight, and body mass index (BMI) for 999 volunteers and 110 PMHSs exposed to 5,431 impacts extracted from 63 published studies and three databases, and then compared the distributions of these parameters to reference data drawn from the neck-injured, fatally-injured, and general populations. We found that the neck biomechanical data were biased toward males, the volunteer data were younger, and the PMHS data were older than the reference populations. Other smaller biases were also noted, particularly within female distributions, in the height, weight, and BMI distributions relative to the neck-injured populations. It is vital to increase the diversity of volunteer and cadaveric test subjects in future studies in order to fill the gaps in the current neck biomechanical data. This increased diversity will provide critical data to address existing inequities in automotive and other safety technologies.