Comparison of a directional cement delivery device versus conventional device in unilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty for the therapy of osteoporotic thoracolumbar fracture in the elderly

• Published in: Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research Vol. 18; no. 1; p. 32
• Main Authors: Zhou, Xiaoji, Liu, Yongtao, Cao, Xiaojian, Jin, Genyang, Li, Hong
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 11.01.2023; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Aged; Care and treatment; Comparative analysis; CT imaging; Orthopedic surgery; Osteoporosis; Percutaneous kyphoplasty; Radiation; Surgeons; Unilateral puncture; Vertebral compression fracture; Osteoporosis; Unilateral puncture; Vertebral compression fracture; Percutaneous kyphoplasty
• ISSN: 1749-799X; 1749-799X
• DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-03506-0

Percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) has been demonstrated to be effective in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF). However, bilateral puncture techniques take more time to accept more X-ray radiation; some spinal surgeons apply unilateral puncture PKP, but the cement cannot be symmetrically distributed in the vertebral body, so we apply a directional bone cement delivery device that undergoes PKP through the unilateral pedicle puncture. This research aims to compare the clinical and radiological results of PKP via unilateral pedicle approach using a traditional bone cement delivery device and a directional bone cement delivery device and determine the value of a directional delivery device for the therapy of thoracolumbar compression fracture in the elderly. We undertook a retrospective analysis of patients with single-level OVCF treated with unilateral pedicle puncture PKP from Jan 2018 to Jan 2020. Operation time, radiation exposure, bone cement injection volume, and the incidence of bone cement leakage were recorded for presentation, and the cement leakage and bone cement distribution were measured by X-ray and computed tomography scan. The patients were followed up postoperatively and were assessed mainly with regard to clinical and radiological outcomes. There was no significant difference in the operation time, radiation exposure time, and incidence of bone cement leakage between the two groups. A significant difference was observed in the volume of bone cement injection between the two groups. All patients in both groups had significantly less pain after the procedures, compared with their preoperative period pain. There were no significant differences in Visual Analogue Scale, the relative height of the vertebral body, Cobb angle, and Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis between the two groups at 1 week after PKP, significant difference was observed only 12 months after operation. Application of directional bone cement delivery device is safe and feasible, compared with the application of traditional bone cement delivery device, without prolonging the operative time, radiation exposure time, and the incidence of bone cement leakage. It has the advantages of good short- and medium-term effect, excellent bone cement distribution, and low incidence of kyphosis recurrence.