Serum creatinine/cystatin C ratio as a muscle mass evaluating tool and prognostic indicator for hospitalized patients: A meta-analysis

• Published in: Frontiers in medicine Vol. 9; p. 1058464
• Main Authors: Zheng, Wen-He, Zhu, Yi-Bing, Yao, Yan, Huang, Hui-Bin
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 09.01.2023
• Subjects: creatinine/cystatin C ratio; hospitalized; Medicine; meta-analysis; mortality; sarcopenia; hospitalized; meta-analysis; mortality; creatinine/cystatin C ratio; sarcopenia
• ISSN: 2296-858X; 2296-858X
• DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1058464

Sarcopenia is a syndrome of decreased muscle mass and deficits in muscle strength and physical function. We aimed to investigate the relationship between creatinine/cystatin C ratio (CCR) and sarcopenia and the prognostic value of CCR in hospitalized patients. We searched for relevant studies in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database up to August 25, 2022. Meta-analyses were performed to evaluate the relationship between CCR and skeletal muscle [computed tomography-assessed skeletal muscle (CTASM), muscle strength, and physical performance], prognosis and important clinical outcomes in hospitalized adults. The pooled correlation coefficient, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and hazard ratio (HR) together with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. We also conducted subgroup analyses to explore the sources of heterogeneity. A total of 38 studies with 20,362 patients were eligible. These studies were of moderate to high quality. Our results showed that CCR was significant correlations with all CTASM types (Fisher's ranged from 0.35 to 0.5; values ranged from < 0.01 to 0.01), handgrip strength (Fisher's = 0.39; 95% CI, 0.32-0.45; < 0.001) and gait speed (Fisher's = 0.25; 95% CI, 0.21-0.30; < 0.001). The ROC curves suggested that CCR had good diagnostic efficacy (0.689; 95% CI, 0.632-0.746; < 0.01) for sarcopenia. CCR can reliably predict mortality in hospitalized patients, which was confirmed by regression analysis of CCR as both continuous (HR 0.78; 95% CI, 0.72-0.84; < 0.01) and categorical variables (HR 2.05; 95% CI, 1.58-2.66; < 0.0001). In addition, less evidence showed that higher CCR was independently associated with a shorter duration of mechanical ventilation, reduced length of stay in the intensive care unit and hospital, less nutritional risk, and decreased complications in hospitalized patients. CCR could be a simple, economical, and effective screening tool for sarcopenia in hospitalized patients, and it is a helpful prognostic factor for mortality and other important clinical outcomes. https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2022-9-0097/, identifier INPLASY202290097.