A comparison between unfocused and focused transmit strategies in cardiac strain imaging

Unfocused ultrasound imaging, particularly coherent compounding with diverging waves, is a commonly employed high-frame rate transmit strategy in cardiac strain imaging. However, the accuracy and precision of diverging wave imaging compared to focused-beam transmit approaches in human subjects is un...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPhysics in medicine & biology Vol. 65; no. 3; pp. 3 - 03NT01
Main Authors Sayseng, Vincent, Grondin, Julien, Weber, Rachel A, Konofagou, Elisa
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England IOP Publishing 24.01.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Unfocused ultrasound imaging, particularly coherent compounding with diverging waves, is a commonly employed high-frame rate transmit strategy in cardiac strain imaging. However, the accuracy and precision of diverging wave imaging compared to focused-beam transmit approaches in human subjects is unknown. Three transmit strategies-coherent compounding imaging, composite focused imaging with ECG gating and narrow-beams, and focused imaging with wide-beams-were compared in simulation and in transthoracic imaging of healthy human subjects (n  =  7). The focused narrow-beam sequence estimated radial end-systolic cumulative strains of a simulated left ventricular deformation with 26%  ±  1.5% and 34%  ±  1.5% greater accuracy compared with compounding and wide-beam imaging, respectively. Strain estimation precision in transthoracic imaging was then assessed with the Strain Filter on cumulative end-systolic radial strains. Within the strain values where statistically significant differences in precision (E(SNRe| )) were found between transmit strategies, the narrow-beam sequence estimated radial strain 13%  ±  0.71% and 34%  ±  8.9% more precisely on average compared to compounding or wide-beam imaging, respectively.
Bibliography:Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine
PMB-108768.R1
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0031-9155
1361-6560
1361-6560
DOI:10.1088/1361-6560/ab4afd