Can urine studies be replaced by serum free light chains measurements to assign responses in multiple myeloma patients?
Serum and urine protein electrophoresis and immunofixation are the preferred techniques for monitoring monoclonal proteins and evaluating treatment response in multiple myeloma (MM) patients with measurable disease. However, urine studies are subjected to limitations that may lead to inaccuracies or...
Saved in:
Published in | Frontiers in oncology Vol. 12; p. 1056293 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Switzerland
Frontiers Media S.A
30.11.2022
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Serum and urine protein electrophoresis and immunofixation are the preferred techniques for monitoring monoclonal proteins and evaluating treatment response in multiple myeloma (MM) patients with measurable disease. However, urine studies are subjected to limitations that may lead to inaccuracies or prevent guidelines compliance. We retrospectively studied if the substitution of urine studies by measuring serum free light chains (sFLCs) results in a comparable disease monitoring, both in intact immunoglobulin (II) and light chain (LC) MM patients. In our cohort, equal or higher percentages of disease were identified by sFLCs at baseline and maximum response as compared to urine studies. Achieving very good partial response or better (≥VGPR) according to the response criteria proposed by the French group (evaluating sFLCs instead of urine) and the IMWG response criteria were associated to a 62% and 63% reduced risk of progression, respectively. A similar prognostic value for reaching ≥VGPR was also observed among LCMM patients when the French group and the IMWG response criteria were applied. Overall, these results support the replacement of urine studies by the sFLCs assay in IIMM. In LCMM, sFLCs could be used for monitoring and urine studies could be performed only to confirm complete remissions and progressions. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Edited by: Sherif Farag, Indiana University School of Medicine, United States Reviewed by: Mohammad Issam Abu Zaid, Indiana University, United States; Srinivas Devarakonda, The Ohio State University, United States This article was submitted to Hematologic Malignancies, a section of the journal Frontiers in Oncology |
ISSN: | 2234-943X 2234-943X |
DOI: | 10.3389/fonc.2022.1056293 |