Isometric handgrip exercise impacts only on very short-term blood pressure variability, but not on short-term blood pressure variability in hypertensive individuals: A randomized controlled trial

The effect of a single isometric handgrip exercise (IHG) on blood pressure (BP) variability (BPV) has not been addressed. This randomized controlled trial evaluated the effect of IHG vs. sham on BPV and BP. Hypertensive patients using up to two BP-lowering medications were randomly assigned to IHG (...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in physiology Vol. 13; p. 962125
Main Authors Bertoletti, Otávio A, Ferrari, Rodrigo, Ferlin, Elton L, Barcellos, Ozi M, Fuchs, Sandra C
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 13.09.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The effect of a single isometric handgrip exercise (IHG) on blood pressure (BP) variability (BPV) has not been addressed. This randomized controlled trial evaluated the effect of IHG vs. sham on BPV and BP. Hypertensive patients using up to two BP-lowering medications were randomly assigned to IHG (4 × 2 min; 30% of maximal voluntary contraction, MVC, with 1 min rest between sets, unilateral) or sham (protocol; 0.3% of MVC). Systolic and diastolic BP were assessed beat-to-beat in the laboratory before, during, and post-intervention and also using 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). BPV was expressed as average real variability (ARV) and standard deviation (SD). Laboratory BPV, ARV and SD variability, had marked increase during the intervention, but not in the sham group, decreasing in the post-intervention recovery period. The overall change in ARV from pre- to 15 min post-intervention were 0.27 ± 0.07 (IHG) vs. 0.05 ± 0.15 (sham group), with a statistically significant -value for interaction. Similarly, mean systolic BP increased during the intervention (IHG 165.4 ± 4.5 vs. sham 152.4 ± 3.5 mmHg; = 0.02) as did diastolic BP (104.0 ± 2.5 vs. 90.5 ± 1.7 mmHg, respectively; < 0.001) and decreased afterward. However, neither the short-term BPV nor BP assessed by ABPM reached statistically significant differences between groups. A single session of IHG reduces very short-term variability but does not affect short-term variability. IHG promotes PEH in the laboratory, but does not sustain 24-h systolic and diastolic PEH beyond the recovery period.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
This article was submitted to Exercise Physiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Physiology
ORCID ID:Otávio A. Bertoletti, orcid.org/0000-0002-6353-040X
Edited by: Raphael Ritti-Dias, Universidade Nove de Julho, Brazil
Moacir Fernandes Godoy, Faculdade de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto, Brazil
Reviewed by: Breno Quintella Farah, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Brazil
ISSN:1664-042X
1664-042X
DOI:10.3389/fphys.2022.962125