Farmers, the practice of farming and the future of agroforestry: an application of Bourdieu's concepts of field and habitus

Agroforestry, the practice of raising crops and trees together in ways that are mutually beneficial, provides farmers with an alternative to more conventional farming practices. In this paper, we apply Bourdieu's concepts of “field” and “habitus” in an attempt to better understand the practice...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inRural sociology Vol. 68; no. 1; pp. 64 - 86
Main Authors Raedeke, A.H, Green, J.J, Hodge, S.S, Valdivia, C
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.03.2003
Rural Sociological Society
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Agroforestry, the practice of raising crops and trees together in ways that are mutually beneficial, provides farmers with an alternative to more conventional farming practices. In this paper, we apply Bourdieu's concepts of “field” and “habitus” in an attempt to better understand the practice of farming and the role that agroforestry may have in farming systems. Analysis is based on qualitative and quantitative interviews of farmers and other key informants in two regions, Fox‐Wyaconda Watershed in northeast Missouri and Scott County in southeast Missouri. Within the field of farming, farmers emphasized the importance of economic, family and rental relations. Important habitus considerations include different interpretations of what constitutes farming and what constitutes forestry. Based on Bourdieu's theoretical framework, we offer three alternative paths of social change that may lead to more widespread utilization of agroforestry.
Bibliography:istex:CC69C99E7C6C6965AA7129E282F8FB6823DF5332
ArticleID:RUSO129
ark:/67375/WNG-J2WDNLHD-N
Rural Sociology
This work was funded through the University of Missouri Center for Agroforestry under cooperative agreements AG‐02100251 with the ARS and C R 826704–01–0 with the U.S. EPA. The results presented are the sole responsibility of the P.I. and/or MU and may not represent the policies or positions of the ARS or EPA. The authors thank Jere Gilles, Ann Tickamyer and
s anonymous reviewers for their comments.
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0036-0112
1549-0831
DOI:10.1111/j.1549-0831.2003.tb00129.x