Farmers, the practice of farming and the future of agroforestry: an application of Bourdieu's concepts of field and habitus
Agroforestry, the practice of raising crops and trees together in ways that are mutually beneficial, provides farmers with an alternative to more conventional farming practices. In this paper, we apply Bourdieu's concepts of “field” and “habitus” in an attempt to better understand the practice...
Saved in:
Published in | Rural sociology Vol. 68; no. 1; pp. 64 - 86 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford, UK
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.03.2003
Rural Sociological Society |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Agroforestry, the practice of raising crops and trees together in ways that are mutually beneficial, provides farmers with an alternative to more conventional farming practices. In this paper, we apply Bourdieu's concepts of “field” and “habitus” in an attempt to better understand the practice of farming and the role that agroforestry may have in farming systems. Analysis is based on qualitative and quantitative interviews of farmers and other key informants in two regions, Fox‐Wyaconda Watershed in northeast Missouri and Scott County in southeast Missouri. Within the field of farming, farmers emphasized the importance of economic, family and rental relations. Important habitus considerations include different interpretations of what constitutes farming and what constitutes forestry. Based on Bourdieu's theoretical framework, we offer three alternative paths of social change that may lead to more widespread utilization of agroforestry. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | istex:CC69C99E7C6C6965AA7129E282F8FB6823DF5332 ArticleID:RUSO129 ark:/67375/WNG-J2WDNLHD-N Rural Sociology This work was funded through the University of Missouri Center for Agroforestry under cooperative agreements AG‐02100251 with the ARS and C R 826704–01–0 with the U.S. EPA. The results presented are the sole responsibility of the P.I. and/or MU and may not represent the policies or positions of the ARS or EPA. The authors thank Jere Gilles, Ann Tickamyer and s anonymous reviewers for their comments. ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 |
ISSN: | 0036-0112 1549-0831 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1549-0831.2003.tb00129.x |