Usefulness of the calculated apparent diffusion coefficient value in the differential diagnosis of retroperitoneal masses

Purpose To elucidate whether or not the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values calculated from echo‐planar diffusion‐weighted (EPDW) MR images are useful in the differential diagnosis of retroperitoneal masses. Materials and Methods In 50 patients with known retroperitoneal masses, EPDW images...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of magnetic resonance imaging Vol. 20; no. 4; pp. 735 - 742
Main Authors Nakayama, Tomohiro, Yoshimitsu, Kengo, Irie, Hiroyuki, Aibe, Hitoshi, Tajima, Tsuyoshi, Shinozaki, Kenji, Nishie, Akihiro, Asayama, Yoshiki, Kakihara, Daisuke, Matsuura, Shuji, Honda, Hiroshi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01.10.2004
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Purpose To elucidate whether or not the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values calculated from echo‐planar diffusion‐weighted (EPDW) MR images are useful in the differential diagnosis of retroperitoneal masses. Materials and Methods In 50 patients with known retroperitoneal masses, EPDW images were performed with b‐factors of 0–1100 seconds/mm2. The final histologic diagnoses of these lesions were as follows: 12 malignant lymphomas, four other malignant mesenchymal neoplasms, 25 malignant epithelial neoplasms, seven benign mesenchymal neoplasms, and two nonneoplastic lesions. The ADC values obtained for the solid portion of the lesions were used to represent each lesion, and the values of the histologic groups were compared. Results The respective value of ADC for 12 malignant lymphomas, four other mesenchymal neoplasms, seven benign mesenchymal neoplasms, and two nonneoplastic lesions were as follows: 0.66 ± 0.26, 1.26 ± 0.50, 0.90 ± 0.20, 1.87 ± 0.48, 1.32 ± 0.20 × 10−3 mm2/second. The ADC value of the malignant lymphoma was significantly lower than that of the other malignant mesenchymal lesions, and was also lower than the ADC of the benign lesions. The ADC value of the malignant epithelial neoplasms was lower than that of the benign mesenchymal tumors. The ADC values of the malignant and benign lesions were 0.94 ± 0.30 and 1.75 ± 0.49 × 10−3 mm2/second, respectively, which also demonstrated a significant difference. Conclusion ADC values calculated from EPDW MR images may provide useful information in the differential diagnosis of retroperitoneal masses. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2004;20:735–742. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Bibliography:ArticleID:JMRI20149
istex:8282A0E6E86F0B1ED74FE87198BA9851944739D8
ark:/67375/WNG-C4W5W49Z-L
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1053-1807
1522-2586
DOI:10.1002/jmri.20149