Extraction of cardiac rhythm devices: indications, techniques and outcomes for the removal of pacemaker and defibrillator leads

• Published in: International journal of clinical practice (Esher) Vol. 64; no. 8; pp. 1140 - 1147
• Main Authors: Farooqi, F. M., Talsania, S., Hamid, S., Rinaldi, C. A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.07.2010; Wiley-Blackwell; Hindawi Limited
• Subjects: Biological and medical sciences; Cardiac arrhythmia; Cardiology - education; Clinical Competence - standards; Defibrillators, Implantable; Device Removal - adverse effects; Device Removal - instrumentation; Device Removal - methods; Education, Medical, Graduate; General aspects; Heart surgery; Humans; Informed Consent; Laser Therapy - methods; Medical equipment; Medical sciences; Pacemaker, Artificial; Prosthesis-Related Infections - surgery; Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects); Surgical Instruments; Transplants & implants; Heart; Removal; Intensive cardiocirculatory care; Prognosis; Indication; Instrumentation therapy; Rhythm; Ablation; Heavy metal; Medicine; Instrumental stimulation; Pacemaker; Lead; Evolution; Medical device; Extraction; Circulatory system; Technique; Defibrillation; Defibrillator
• ISSN: 1368-5031; 1742-1241
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2010.02338.x

Summary Cardiac rhythm management devices (pacemakers) are being increasingly implanted worldwide not only for symptomatic bradycardia, but also for the management of arrhythmia and heart failure. Their use in more elderly patients with significant comorbidities is rising steeply and consequently long‐term complications are increasingly arising. Such an increase in device therapy is being paralleled by an increase in the requirement for system extraction. Safe lead extraction is central to the management of much of the complications related to pacemakers. The most common indication for lead extraction is system infection Adhesions in chronically implanted leads can become major obstacles to safe lead extraction and life‐threatening bleeding and cardiac perforations may occur. Over the last 20 years, specific tools and techniques for transvenous lead extraction have been developed to assist in freeing the lead body from the adhesions. This article provides a comprehensive review of the indications, tools, techniques and outcomes for transvenous lead extraction. The success rate largely depends on the time from implant. Up to 12 months from implant, it is rare that traction alone will not suffice. For longer lead implant duration, no single technique is sufficient to address all extractions, but laser provides the best chance of extracting the entire lead. Operator experience is vital in determining success as familiarity of a wide array of techniques will increase the likelihood of uncomplicated extraction. Long implantation time, lack of operator experience, ICD lead type and female gender are risk factors for life‐threatening complications. Lead extraction should therefore, ideally be performed in high volume centres with experienced staff and on‐site support from a cardiothoracic surgical team able to deal with bleeding complications from cardiovascular perforation.