Deformation of femoral nails with intramedullary insertion

Current methods of distal interlocking of intramedullary femoral nails are dependent on image intensification. However, radiation exposure to the patient, the operating room staff, and the surgeon remains a concern. Proximally mounted, radiation‐free aiming systems for distal interlocking of femoral...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of orthopaedic research Vol. 16; no. 5; pp. 572 - 575
Main Authors Krettek, Christian, Mannß, Jürgen, Miclau, Theodore, Schandelmaier, Peter, Linnemann, Ina, Tscherne, Harald
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01.09.1998
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Current methods of distal interlocking of intramedullary femoral nails are dependent on image intensification. However, radiation exposure to the patient, the operating room staff, and the surgeon remains a concern. Proximally mounted, radiation‐free aiming systems for distal interlocking of femoral nails have reportedly failed because of nail deformation with insertion. To better understand this deformation, a threedimensional magnetic motion tracking system was used to determine the position of the distal interlocking hole following nail insertion. The amount and direction of deformation of commercially available smalldiameter implants (unslotted 9‐mm nails inserted without reaming) and large‐diameter implants (slotted 13‐mm nails inserted with reaming) from a single manufacturer were analyzed. Measurements of deformation (three translations and three angles), based on the center of the distal transverse locking hole, were performed on 10 paired intact human cadaveric femora before and after insertion. The technique produced the following results for the small and large‐diameter nails, respectively: lateral translations of 18.1 ± 10.0 mm (mean ± SD, range: 47.8 mm) and 21.5 ± 7.9 mm (range: 26.4 mm), dorsal translations of ‐3.1 ± 4.3 mm (range: 15.2 mm) and 0.4 ± 9.8 mm (range: 30.1 mm), and rotation about the longitudinal axes of −0.1 ± 0.2° (range: 0.7°) and 10.0 ±3.1° (range: 7.8°). This technique is useful for measuring insertion‐related femoral nail deformation. The data for the nails tested suggest that a simple aiming arm, mounted on the proximal end of the femoral nail alone, will not sufficiently provide accurate distal aiming.
Bibliography:istex:6B2CE5FA4AD53BA09B7A491734CD44A8115D9733
ArticleID:JOR1100160508
ark:/67375/WNG-2CSTKC9Z-2
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0736-0266
1554-527X
DOI:10.1002/jor.1100160508