In vivo oxidation in retrieved highly crosslinked tibial inserts

The current study determined (I) the environment where oxidation in a series of retrieved, HXL UHMWPE tibial inserts occurred (in vivo or postexplant); and (II) the effect of fabrication variables (irradiation source, irradiation dose) and thermal processing after irradiation (annealing or remelting...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials Vol. 101B; no. 3; pp. 441 - 448
Main Authors Currier, B. H., Van Citters, D. W., Currier, J. H., Carlson, E. M., Tibbo, M. E., Collier, J. P.
Format Journal Article Conference Proceeding
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01.04.2013
Wiley-Blackwell
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The current study determined (I) the environment where oxidation in a series of retrieved, HXL UHMWPE tibial inserts occurred (in vivo or postexplant); and (II) the effect of fabrication variables (irradiation source, irradiation dose) and thermal processing after irradiation (annealing or remelting) on oxidation resistance. Hypotheses examined are (1) HXL UHMWPE tibial inserts have potential to oxidize in vivo, and (2) annealed HXL UHMWPE oxidizes at a higher rate in vivo than remelted HXL UHMWPE. Highly crosslinked UHMWPE tibial inserts (87), received by an IRB‐approved retrieval laboratory from 20 surgeons at 10 institutions across the U.S., were analyzed from 2005 to 2011. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy was used to determine oxidation and trans‐vinylene index for each retrieved insert. Measured oxidation that was maximum subsurface was found in 56% of all HXL tibial inserts. This maximum oxidation correlated significantly with in vivo time, trans‐vinylene index, and thermal processing after irradiation. Articular oxidation rate correlated with crosslinking irradiation dose and thermal processing after irradiation. Retrieved below‐melt annealed tibial inserts had significantly higher articular oxidation rates than remelted tibial inserts (p < 0.001). Articular oxidation rates correlated positively with cross‐linking irradiation dose and postirradiation thermal processing. Edge oxidation correlated with postirradiation thermal processing. Oxidation of HXL UHMWPE may have clinical implications for tibial inserts, since loss of UHMWPE toughness resulting from oxidation has led to fatigue damage in gamma‐sterilized tibial inserts. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 101B: 441–448, 2013.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-MV45XNT9-4
How to cite this article: Currier B. H., Van Citters D. W., Currier J. H., Carlson E. M., Tibbo M. E., Collier J. P., 2013. In vivo oxidation in retrieved highly crosslinked Tibial inserts. J Biomed Mater Res Part B 2013:101B:441-448.
ArticleID:JBM32805
NIST - No. 60NANB5D1250
istex:5A47956EAE9C94FB4D8D61319B8D38D816C9386C
In vivo
How to cite this article
Currier B. H., Van Citters D. W., Currier J. H., Carlson E. M., Tibbo M. E., Collier J. P., 2013.
oxidation in retrieved highly crosslinked Tibial inserts. J Biomed Mater Res Part B 2013:101B:441–448.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1552-4973
1552-4981
DOI:10.1002/jbm.b.32805