Multi-Center Comparison of Response to a Single Tablet of Sumatriptan 85 mg and Naproxen 500 mg vs Usual Therapy Treating Multiple Migraine Attacks as Measured by the Completeness of Response Survey

(Headache 2011;51:961‐970) Objective.— To investigate a broad definition of migraine resolution that extends beyond specific migraine‐associated diagnostic symptoms as measured by the Completeness of Response Survey. Methods.— Conducted at 8 sites, 135 subjects treated migraines with SumaRT/Nap over...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHeadache Vol. 51; no. 6; pp. 961 - 970
Main Authors Cady, Roger, Banks, Jim, Nett, Robert B., Goldstein, Jerome, Bennett, Nathan, Turner, Ira M., Ruoff, Gary E., Landy, Stephen H., Farmer, Kathleen, Juhász, Márta, Tarrasch, Jeanne, Runken, M. Chris
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Malden, USA Blackwell Publishing Inc 01.06.2011
Wiley-Blackwell
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:(Headache 2011;51:961‐970) Objective.— To investigate a broad definition of migraine resolution that extends beyond specific migraine‐associated diagnostic symptoms as measured by the Completeness of Response Survey. Methods.— Conducted at 8 sites, 135 subjects treated migraines with SumaRT/Nap over 2 months. To measure subjects' experiences with SumaRT/Nap compared to their usual migraine medication, the Headache Impact Test, Revised Patient Perception of Migraine Questionnaire, and Completeness of Response Survey were administered at baseline and at 2 months. Results.— The effects of the study medicine compared to the subjects' usual migraine medicine reached statistical significance in decreasing headache severity, lessening of associated symptoms, and attaining complete relief with a single dose (60.04% of attacks resolved at 2 hours post‐treatment). Conclusion.— Compared to a subject's usual treatment, SumaRT/Nap used early and consistently for treatment of acute migraine offers important clinical improvements, including lessening of associated symptoms beyond International Headache Society criteria.
Bibliography:ArticleID:HEAD1912
istex:F8B01436EBB2D063DA0781C4196AED6EA73C8583
ark:/67375/WNG-KB71DK5B-W
Conflict of Interest
Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT00893737.
Financial support: Roger K. Cady, MD, sponsored this research through a grant from GlaxoSmithKline.
Dr. Roger Cady: Consultant for GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Ortho‐McNeil. Research grants from Allergan, Endo Pharmaceuticals, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Pozen, PuraMed Bioscience, and Wyeth. Dr. Jerome Goldstein has served as a consultant and/or advisory boards for GlaxoSmithKline as well as multiple pharmaceutical companies. Dr. James Banks, Dr. Robert Nett, Dr. Nathan Bennett, and Dr. Goldstein as investigators received research support from GlaxoSmithKline. Dr. Ira Turner has served as a consultant and/or speaker's bureau for Allergan, Astellas, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Merz Pharmaceuticals, Zogenix, and has received research support from Allergan, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, NINDS, and NuPathe. Dr. Gary Ruoff has served on the speaker's bureau and as investigator received research grants from GlaxoSmithKline. Dr. Stephen Landy is on GlaxoSmithKline speaker's bureau and has been compensated for GSK related migraine research. Dr. Chris Runken is an employee of GlaxoSmithKline, Inc. Dr. Kathleen Farmer and Ms. Jeanne Tarrasch have nothing to disclose.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0017-8748
1526-4610
1526-4610
DOI:10.1111/j.1526-4610.2011.01912.x