Psychrophilic anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass: A characterization study

•Cow feces and wheat straw psychrophilic anaerobic digestion is feasible at <32 days.•Cow feces and wheat straw yielded around 235 Nl CH4kg−1VS fed.•Cellulose, xylan, and their mixture achieved 95% conversion into CH4 in 35 days.•Less than 20 days are required to achieve a conversion of 80%.•Meth...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBioresource technology Vol. 142; pp. 663 - 671
Main Authors Saady, Noori M. Cata, Massé, Daniel I.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Kidlington Elsevier Ltd 01.08.2013
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•Cow feces and wheat straw psychrophilic anaerobic digestion is feasible at <32 days.•Cow feces and wheat straw yielded around 235 Nl CH4kg−1VS fed.•Cellulose, xylan, and their mixture achieved 95% conversion into CH4 in 35 days.•Less than 20 days are required to achieve a conversion of 80%.•Methane yield (Nl CH4kg−1VS) was 338 (cellulose), 310 (xylan), and 305 (mixture). Psychrophilic (20°C) specific methane (CH4) yield from cellulose (C), xylan (X), cellulose/xylan mixture (CX), cow feces (CF), and wheat straw (WS) achieved (Nl CH4kg−1VS) of 338.5±14.3 (C), 310.5±3.4 (X), 305.5±29.6 (CX mixture), and 235.3±22.7 (WS) during 56days, and 237.6±17.7 (CF) during 70days. These yields corresponded to COD recovery of 73.3±3.1% (C)=69.1±0.76% (X)=67.3±5.8% (CX mixture)>52.9±2.6% (CF)>46.5±2.7% (WS). Cellulose-fed culture had a lower and statistically different initial CH4 production rate from those calculated for cultures fed X, CX mixture, CF and WS. It seemed that the presence of hemicellulose in complex substrate such as wheat straw and cow feces supported the higher initial CH4 rate compared to cellulose. Biomethanation of the pure and complex lignocellulosic substrates tested is feasible at psychrophilic conditions given that a well-adapted inoculum is used; however, hydrolysis was the rate limiting step.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0960-8524
1873-2976
DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2013.05.089