Measuring fruit patch size for three sympatric indonesian primate species

• Published in: Primates Vol. 43; no. 1; pp. 19 - 27
• Main Authors: Wich, S A, Fredriksson, G, Sterck, E H M
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Japan Springer Nature B.V 01.01.2002
• Subjects: Animal ecology; Animals; Availability; Behavior, Animal; Cercopithecidae - physiology; Environment; Feeding Behavior - physiology; Female; Food; Food availability; Food security; Food Supply; Forage; Foraging behavior; Fruit; Fruits; Indonesia; Macaca fascicularis - physiology; Male; Monkeys & apes; Orangutans; Phenology; Physical anthropology; Plant species; Pongo pygmaeus - physiology; Primates; Primatology; Species; Sympatric populations; Trees
• ISSN: 0032-8332; 1610-7365
• DOI: 10.1007/bf02629573

Food availability is one of the basic factors affecting primate density and socioecology, but food availability is difficult to assess. Two different ways to obtain accurate estimates of food availability have been proposed: using phenology data or using the behaviour of animals. Phenology data can be refined by only including trees that are large enough to be used; including (potential) tree species in which by the concerned primate species forage; or including (fruiting) trees of these species that actually produce fruit. Alternatively, the sizes of the actually visited trees (foraging trees) give an estimate of fruit availability. These measures are compared for three sympatric primate species at the Ketambe Research Station, Sumatra, Indonesia: the Thomas langur, the long-tailed macaque and the orangutan. The sizes of fruiting trees and the foraging trees are larger than the potential trees. The sizes of the potential trees and of the fruiting trees are similar for the three primate species. This, however, is not reflected in the use of trees: the langurs forage on average in trees of similar size to those producing fruit, whereas the macaques and orangutans forage in trees larger than those producing fruit. The use of trees does not necessitate a different cut off point of included dbhs for the three compared primate species. The use of trees of different sizes, however, may be regulated by food competition. This indicates that sympatric primates make different foraging decisions and that behavioural measures of food availability will be less reliable.