Morphometrics as a Complementary Tool in the Differentiation of Two Cosmopolitan Flea Species: Ctenocephalides felis and Ctenocephalides canis

• Published in: Insects (Basel, Switzerland) Vol. 13; no. 8; p. 707
• Main Authors: García-Sánchez, Angela María, Zurita, Antonio, Cutillas, Cristina
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 05.08.2022; MDPI
• Subjects: Biology; Biometrics; Classification; Ctenocephalides; Ctenocephalides canis; Ctenocephalides felis; Differentiation; Discriminant analysis; Dogs; Ectoparasites; Females; fleas; geometric morphometrics; Males; Molecular biology; Morphology; morphometrics; Pathogens; PCA; Physical characteristics; Populations; Principal components analysis; Siphonaptera; Software; Species; Species classification; Statistical analysis; Variance analysis; Iran; Asia; Europe; Africa; South Africa; Germany; Spain
• ISSN: 2075-4450; 2075-4450
• DOI: 10.3390/insects13080707

Fleas (Siphonaptera) are one of the most important ectoparasites that represent a potential danger for the transmission of pathogens in our environment. The cat flea, Ctenocephalides felis (Bouché, 1835), and the dog flea, Ctenocephalides canis (Curtis, 1826) are among the most prevalent and most frequently studied species throughout the world. However, the variations observed in their morphological characteristics complicate their correct identification, especially when there is a lack of access to the equipment and funds required to carry out molecular biology techniques. With the objective to provide an additional tool to help in the differentiation of Ctenocephalides species, a principal component analysis was carried out for the first time in the present work on populations of C. felis and C. canis from countries in three continents, namely Spain (Europe), South Africa (Africa) and Iran (Asia). The factor maps assisted in the differentiation of both species and the detection of differences in overall size, although morphological ambiguity prevented the delimitation in populations of the same species. Thus, morphometrics represents a complementary tool to other traditional and modern techniques, with great potential to assist in the differentiation of fleas, particularly species that have historically been difficult to identify.