Is the Life History Calendar a Valid Measure of Child Custody Loss among Birth Mothers with Serious Mental Illness?

As of October 9, 2009, 463,000 children were receiving care in the public foster care system (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2009). Parental rights to 75,000 (16%) had been terminated. Parents with serious mental illness (SMI) are confronted with increased risk of involvement with the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSocial work research Vol. 35; no. 1; pp. 53 - 57
Main Authors Hollingsworth, Leslie Doty, MacFarlane, Peter, Rassi, Stephen L.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford National Association of Social Workers 01.03.2011
Oxford University Press
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:As of October 9, 2009, 463,000 children were receiving care in the public foster care system (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2009). Parental rights to 75,000 (16%) had been terminated. Parents with serious mental illness (SMI) are confronted with increased risk of involvement with the child welfare system and of having their children placed in out-of-home care (Park, Solomon, & Mandell, 2006; Sands, Koppelman, & Solomon, 2004). In fact, five states (Alaska, Arizona, California, Kentucky, and North Dakota) and Puerto Rico list mental illness or disability as grounds for not providing reasonable efforts toward reunification (Kaplan, Kottsieper, Scott, Salzer, & Solomon, 2009). The reality of threats to the parenting status of people with mental illness, particularly the influence of stigma on policy and services decisions, makes this an important area for social work research. Because much of the research on custody loss among women with SMI is dependent on self-reports, valid measures are imperative. In the present study, we were interested in discovering whether a Life History Calendar (LHC) would provide a valid measure of custody loss. Using a sample from a longitudinal study of women with SMI who were parents, we compared their responses on an LHC with their responses to a standard structured interview questionnaire. Adapted from the source document.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1070-5309
1545-6838
DOI:10.1093/swr/35.1.53