Late Presentation and Loss to Follow-Up of Immigrants Newly Diagnosed with HIV in the HAART Era

To compare clinical characteristics and therapeutic management of newly HIV-diagnosed immigrants to natives. Patients with a first HIV diagnosis from 1996 to 2010 were included. Of 716 new diagnoses, 85 (12 %) were immigrants. Migrants were younger, more frequently females and sexually infected, les...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of immigrant and minority health Vol. 16; no. 4; pp. 751 - 755
Main Authors Saracino, A., Tartaglia, A., Trillo, G., Muschitiello, C., Bellacosa, C., Brindicci, G., Monno, L., Angarano, G.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Boston Springer Science + Business Media 01.08.2014
Springer US
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To compare clinical characteristics and therapeutic management of newly HIV-diagnosed immigrants to natives. Patients with a first HIV diagnosis from 1996 to 2010 were included. Of 716 new diagnoses, 85 (12 %) were immigrants. Migrants were younger, more frequently females and sexually infected, less likely to voluntarily request testing, and less HCV-coinfected. Late presenters (CD4 <350 or AIDS) were 76 % among migrants versus 56 % in natives (p = 0.006) with an increasing trend over time. HAART was initiated in 76.5 % of natives and 72.4 % of immigrants; the number/type of adverse events and treatment discontinuation were similar. Immigrants received more NNRTIs-based regimens. A similar proportion of patients reached virological suppression at month 1–3–6 after HAART initiation, but 43 % of immigrants versus 27 % of natives resulted lost to follow-up (p < 0.001). Diagnosis of HIV was often delayed among migrants, who also presented a higher rate of lost to follow-up.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1557-1912
1557-1920
DOI:10.1007/s10903-013-9863-z