Efficacy and safety of switching to bilastine, an H1-antihistamine, in patients with refractory chronic spontaneous urticaria (H1-SWITCH): a multicenter, open-label, randomized, parallel-group comparative study

For treating patients with refractory chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) resistant to standard doses of 2 generation H1-antihistamines (H1AH) the International and Japanese guidelines recommend increasing H1AH dose. The latter also recommends switching to a different H1AH. This study explored if th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in immunology Vol. 15; p. 1441478
Main Authors Fukunaga, Atsushi, Kakei, Yasumasa, Murakami, Sae, Kan, Yuji, Masuda, Koji, Jinnin, Masatoshi, Washio, Ken, Amano, Hiroo, Nagano, Tohru, Yamamoto, Akihisa, Otsuka, Toshihiro, Takahagi, Shunsuke, Takenaka, Motoi, Ishiguro, Naoko, Hayama, Koremasa, Inomata, Naoko, Nakagawa, Yukinobu, Sugiyama, Akiko, Hide, Michihiro
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 16.09.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1664-3224
1664-3224
DOI10.3389/fimmu.2024.1441478

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:For treating patients with refractory chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) resistant to standard doses of 2 generation H1-antihistamines (H1AH) the International and Japanese guidelines recommend increasing H1AH dose. The latter also recommends switching to a different H1AH. This study explored if the efficacy of the standard dose of bilastine 20 mg is non-inferior to that of double-dose of H1AH in patients with refractory CSU. This phase IV, multicenter, open-label, randomized, parallel-group trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of switching treatment to bilastine compared to treatment with a 2-fold dose of H1AH in patients with CSU refractory to standard dose H1AH. The primary endpoint was the mean total symptom score (TSS) at Day 5-7 after the start of administration. Treatment efficacy and safety were evaluated in 128 patients (bilastine, n=64; 2-fold dose of H1AH, n=64). The mean TSS at Day 5-7 after the start of administration was smaller than the non-inferiority margin of 0.8, demonstrating non-inferiority of the bilastine switching group to the double-dose H1AH group (0.17 (95% CI -0.32, 0.67)). No difference in Japanese version of Epworth Sleepiness Scale (JESS), DLQI, and urticaria activity score over 7 consecutive days (UAS7) was observed between the two groups. There were no serious adverse events in either group. H1AH-related adverse events occurred in 5 subjects (8 cases) and 2 subjects (3 cases) in the double-dose H1AH and bilastine groups, respectively. Switching treatment to bilastine demonstrated non-inferiority to a double-dose of H1AH in terms of efficacy in patients with CSU refractory to standard dose H1AH with a favorable safety profile. https://jrct.niph.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCTs051180105, identifier jRCTs051180105.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
Reviewed by: Chaoyu Wang, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, China
Edited by: Arturo Borzutzky, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Chile
Indrashis Podder, College of Medicine and Sagore Dutta Hospital, India
ISSN:1664-3224
1664-3224
DOI:10.3389/fimmu.2024.1441478