Enucleation for Open Globe Injury

Purpose To report the experience of enucleation after open globe at an ophthalmic trauma referral center. Design Retrospective, observational study. Methods In an ophthalmic trauma referral center the charts of all patients having suffered an open globe injury between January 1, 2000 and June 30, 20...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmerican journal of ophthalmology Vol. 147; no. 4; pp. 595 - 600.e1
Main Authors Savar, Aaron, Andreoli, Michael T, Kloek, Carolyn E, Andreoli, Christopher M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.04.2009
Elsevier
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Purpose To report the experience of enucleation after open globe at an ophthalmic trauma referral center. Design Retrospective, observational study. Methods In an ophthalmic trauma referral center the charts of all patients having suffered an open globe injury between January 1, 2000 and June 30, 2007 were reviewed. Variables assessed were age, gender, type of injury (rupture or laceration [penetrating, intraocular foreign body, or perforating]), ocular trauma score, visual acuity, subsequent enucleation, indication for and timing of enucleation, presence of sympathetic ophthalmia, and length of follow-up. Results Among 660 open globe injuries, 55 have undergone enucleation (including 4 eviscerations), 11 primarily and 44 secondarily. Eyes with ruptures were significantly more likely to be enucleated than those with injuries attributable to lacerations ( P < .001). The most common reason for secondary enucleation was a blind, painful eye. Two patients (0.3%) developed sympathetic ophthalmia and have maintained good vision in the sympathizing eye. Conclusions The vast majority of open globes can be repaired without requiring primary enucleation. Secondary enucleation is most commonly carried out for pain. Eyes with no light perception can be closely observed if the patient chooses.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Case Study-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-4
content type line 23
ObjectType-Report-1
ObjectType-Article-3
ISSN:0002-9394
1879-1891
DOI:10.1016/j.ajo.2008.10.017