Parental Recreational Drug Use and Risk for Neural Tube Defects
The authors investigated whether maternal or paternal periconceptional use of recreational drugs increased the risk of having neural tube defect (NTD)-affected pregnancies using a population-based case-control study of fetuses and liveborn infants with NTDs among 1989–1991 California births. Face-to...
Saved in:
Published in | American journal of epidemiology Vol. 144; no. 12; pp. 1155 - 1160 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Cary, NC
Oxford University Press
15.12.1996
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The authors investigated whether maternal or paternal periconceptional use of recreational drugs increased the risk of having neural tube defect (NTD)-affected pregnancies using a population-based case-control study of fetuses and liveborn infants with NTDs among 1989–1991 California births. Face-to-face interviews were conducted with mothers of 538 (88% of eligible) NTD cases and 539 (88%) nonmalformed controls, usually within 5 months of delivery. Periconceptional maternal use of cocaine (odds ratio (OR) = 0.74, 95% confidence interval (Cl) 0.40–1.4), amphetamines/speed (OR = 0.68, 95% Cl 0.39–1.2), or marijuana (OR = 0.64, 95% Cl 0.43–0.95) or preconceptional use of alcohol as <1 drink/day (OR = 0.80, 95% Cl 0.62–1.0) or ≥1 drink/day (OR = 0.69, 95% Cl 0.42–1.2) or of cigarettes as >1 pack/day (OR = 0.90, 95% Cl 0.65–1.2) or ≥1 pack/day (OR = 0.59, 95% Cl 0.36–0.96) did not increase the risk for delivering NTD-affected offspring. Risks were not substantially altered after adjustment for maternal age, race/ethnicity, vitamin use, education, and household income. Increased NTD risk was also not generally associated with paternal drug use. The authors could not discern whether the decreased risks observed for these maternal exposures reflected a true association or were due to reporting bias, a disproportionate number of drug-exposed NTD cases among spontaneous abortuses that could not be ascertained, or some other bias. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Reprint requests to Dr Gary M. Shaw, California Birth Defects Monitoring Program, 1900 Powell St., Suite 1050, Emeryville, CA 94608 ark:/67375/HXZ-1181JCVC-W istex:18CA4E25B752503713C8075E165B223F495D7420 ArticleID:144.12.1155 ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0002-9262 1476-6256 |
DOI: | 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008894 |